But through this case, we find that this is not the case. August 1998, 12, in Yinzhou district, Tieling city. Han Xianhui killed his colleague. He went to the police station after killing his colleague. Claiming that his colleague committed suicide, the police arrived at the scene only to find that the man was dead. After the court's decision, I think what the defendant Han Xianhui said is true to some extent, but it cannot be used as evidence to convict him. It was because he could not be convicted and the evidence involved did not reach a certain degree of full and complete affirmation that Han Xianhui deliberately killed people. So after the court ruled, I decided to cancel.
Han Xianhui was acquitted when he decided to change his sentence to intentional homicide. However, as we all know, killing people is not a trivial matter, and it is not just because a person's words judge whether a person is guilty or not. I went to the Higher People's Court of Liaoning Province, hoping that the Higher People's Court of Liaoning Province could retry this case according to the previous inherent trial procedure. However, the Higher People's Court of Liaoning Province stated that. After all considerations, we will reopen the case.
In fact, when we look back at what happened, it is not difficult to find that the root cause of this thing is only a very small thing, but such a thing happened. But because Han Xianhui was not guilty in the second trial, he wanted to go back. There is sufficient evidence to declare to the Higher People's Court of Liaoning Province that it can apply for compensation. And this compensation is the state's compensation for his mental damage.