I admit that this topic is

harbour evil designs

Yes, I want to attract people's attention on purpose. But what I want to say has nothing to do with the news.

be

, has nothing to do with the news.

Two years ago, I liked Sohu better than Sina. I usually watch Sohu before going to work every day. But later, I found out that I used to open the website every day to watch Sina news first, and then go to Sohu news. I didn't notice this subtle change, and I don't know why.

Today, the editor threw me new magazines and newspapers, all of which are the latest issues. They are very miscellaneous, and there are many in Hongkong and the west of Taiwan Province Province. Many people think that western publications are better than ours, which I agree with. After all, western fonts are better than Chinese characters in design and typesetting (generally speaking, Chinese characters printed with lead are not very good-looking); Secondly, everyone has a latent mental state that is deeply impressed by strange things. Me too, staring at a pile of magazines and newspapers in Hong Kong, Taiwan and the West on my desk, I suddenly thought of what is slowly affecting my reading habits?

Judging from the news quality of Sohu and Sina, since Home is in the North, the quality of news itself has been greatly improved, both in quantity and quality, so the existing news gap between the two companies is not the main reason that affects my reading habits. But both newspapers and websites have them.

Setting type

Every layout adjustment should cater to readers and make them more comfortable.

Wall street journal

Advertisements published abroad emphasize the convenience of reading in airports, cafes or cars, so their advertising pictures are generally convenient for a person to browse the newspapers in his hand. The advertising words are mostly "In London, Hong Kong and Malaysia-you can easily get the news information you want at any time".

I have never used the slogan "I have more financial news than others, and mine is more complete than others". Thought of here, I have a feeling that I

I think I am more comfortable watching Sina news than watching Sohu news.

Open news.sohu.com and news.sina.com.cn.

It can be seen that both websites adopt a three-column frame structure. Sohu puts all news headlines on the far left side of the page, and special topics and pictures on the right side of the page. On the other hand, Sina puts special topics and news pictures on the far left and a large number of news headlines on the right side of the page. good

Although on the surface, there is no obvious difference, if we invite a group of volunteers to test the reading convenience experiment, we should be able to get more relaxed and happy data results from reading Sina news than Sohu news. I wonder if Sohu has done such an experiment. If not, I'd be happy to sign up as a volunteer.

Do web browsing and print reading have anything in common? Will a reader who is used to plane reading in life be more suitable for browsing the web in this way? For example, we are used to reading from left to right in printed matter, and then the next page; ; We are used to seeing the big picture on the left and the specific content and text on the right. Just like turning pages with our right hand, they are all subtle movements. When studying abroad, foreign students from China are the least accustomed to driving on the left. So when we read Sohu News and Sina News, do these reasons also cause the difference in reader's comfort?

I pay close attention to it. When I was browsing Sina news, the range of mouse activity was probably at the bottom right of the page. Because the page is very long, I use the scroll wheel or cursor in the middle of the mouse to drag the slider on the far right of the page, and then I can easily click on the news on the right and browse one by one. When I browse Sohu News, my mouse activity is often the span of the whole page-because I need to drag the slider to the lower right corner of the page, drag the whole page down, and then jump the mouse to the upper left corner of the page to pick up a column of news. For a reader who is used to browsing quickly, this seems to be a very unpleasant job.

Most of the time, the mouse stays at the bottom right of the page, which is the result of measured data abroad. Then the track length of the route also affects the reader's reading comfort. The reason is just like the gap between the domestic home improvement design industry level and the foreign design level: we just know that when the functional areas are separated, people pursue the shortest distance between functional areas. Although this is not a fatal gap, it is difficult to change if you develop reading habits.

I think it is certain that I am used to the comfort of Sina news reading, so I tend to read more often. The result of comfort is that I have browsed all the news in the shortest time and the shortest distance.

My feeling: In fact, there are two reasons: one is the traditional reading habit, and the other is laziness. I agree with the second point.

When I first chose the news website, I considered the following principles: first, the speed should be fast, and second, the layout should be concise, because everyone's content is similar. Then I went to the mainstream news websites one by one, and finally chose People's Network. Actually, I just feel fast.

In fact, Sina is the most famous website, but I decided not to choose it after going in several times. The reason is that as soon as I see those massive navigation bars, the super-dense line spacing of titles with the same font size, and the almost bottomless above the fold, I feel headache. There was too much junk on the Internet. Is it my failure to make it like this? In contrast, Sohu is better, big and small, complicated and simple. Xinhuanet and People's Network are both very big. Is this to take care of the elderly leaders?

Recently, I changed my homepage to Xinhuanet, because People's Network is so powerful that it is the voice of the Party. I was afraid that I would …, so I changed. I always thought the news content was similar before, but later I learned to spread and so on. Xinhuanet's vision is still relatively broad, but it is still a bit …, Netease's advertisements are too vulgar, and Phoenix's website is a bit not popular enough. As for the online platforms of those newspapers, it is even worse and more stingy.