The number of nuclear weapons we have can only be considered as grass-weight fighters, and the nuclear weapons owned by the United States and Russia are all heavyweight fighters. If China wants to become a world-class country, it must become a heavyweight boxer. Grass heavyweight fighters have no right to speak in front of heavyweight fighters. China people can see clearly that in the current international relations, the United States is taking a bunch of little brothers to China everywhere. This is an obvious example, so we must have a strong nuclear force.
Possession of powerful nuclear weapons is a necessary condition! Influenced by the Confucianism of the Han people, we have the promise of not using nuclear weapons first, the thinking of only defending our country, not attacking or invading, and even not taking the initiative to recover the embezzled land. Today, because we believe in the law of the jungle, the U.S. imperialists only believe that we are large herbivores, and some nuclear weapons have no deterrent effect on us, so they will try their best to squeeze and persecute our national enterprises and people, such as China Bank's future debt of $280 and BYD's mask refund. Even the power of the herbivorous elephant when he is furious should make him tremble!
How many nuclear bombs are needed? China's answer is: Enough. But you never know the exact number. This is the difference between Chinese medicine and western medicine. What do you mean, enough to destroy the enemy, enough to retaliate against the enemy, enough to subdue the enemy's ambition, and enough to make yourself confident? Different situations, different technical means and different quantities are under control. how much is it? Go and guess. What do you mean? Determined, confident and capable? , you know!
Possession of nuclear weapons may not necessarily lead to happiness, but as a big country or a country mediating between big countries, it will certainly not be very happy without nuclear weapons? . I don't understand why it is emphasized that big countries should possess nuclear weapons and small countries should not. If Iraq had nuclear weapons, Saddam could still show off on the international stage today.
A country as big as ours would have been a colony as early as the 1960s without nuclear weapons. Today, you don't have to worry about possessing nuclear weapons. Look at how small countries mediate between big countries and how big countries like Canada sneer at the United States. Possession of nuclear weapons may not guarantee whether you are rich or happy, but at least it can guarantee you from war. Without nuclear weapons, you are not qualified and have the opportunity to consider these issues.
The question is, are you willing to worship your eldest brother, be America's minion and accept American protection? The west is a dualistic world view. If you can't be my friend, you can only be my enemy. It is no joke for us to be enemies with the world's number one nuclear weapon state. We should have the means and courage to mutually assured destruction!
People's lives may not be happy with powerful nuclear weapons, but only with powerful nuclear weapons can people in this country be happy. Any happiness must be built in a peaceful and peaceful environment, on the premise of ensuring life safety first!
Is that what the enemy thinks? Why do they have so many nuclear weapons, aircraft carrier fleets and even space weapons? Their weapons can be invincible. Why don't they trust? China was forced out. Why do people always come to your door to sail freely, always plan you, and always want to bring you down and make you split, turbulent and develop steadily? They feel sick. No matter how to strengthen armaments, China is also on guard. A nation that built the Great Wall will not take the initiative to start a war. Everything is to protect the country. As long as enough is enough, the national economy can bear it, and it is not too much to do.
Nuclear weapons are not omnipotent, and nothing can be achieved without them. If China had no nuclear weapons, China's security would not be as it is today, and you would be threatened by nuclear weapons at any time. This is why we have to tighten our belts and engage in nuclear weapons under extremely difficult circumstances, which is why so many countries desperately want to engage in it. At present, the president of the United States is a gambler, so it is necessary to increase the number of nuclear weapons and maintain sufficient deterrent force to prevent American lunatics from acting rashly.
Why are the experiences of North Korea and Iran different? Because North Korea has nuclear weapons, once Iran has nuclear weapons, its voice will definitely be different. If China does not have nuclear weapons now, what happened to China in the world can be imagined. Big countries have nuclear weapons, and now they are suppressing small countries and are not allowed to develop nuclear weapons. It seems to be for world peace, but why doesn't the whole world destroy nuclear weapons? Wouldn't the world be more peaceful? But at present, it is impossible for big countries to give up nuclear weapons. With nuclear weapons, it is also a check and balance, and big countries will not go to war rashly because of the serious consequences. It is worth noting that small countries without nuclear weapons will only be bullied. If there is no ambition, will there be no ambition of a big country? The whole world had better listen to him. Only he can exploit you and bully you. You can only swallow it. Is this world fair?