There is a saying that "A Dream of Red Mansions wakes people up and eventually disperses", and the level is "level one". Some people are right about The Journey to the West. This duality is "flat and flat". From an ordinary point of view, it is completely out of line with the rules. From the part of speech, "waking up from a dream" is a subject-predicate structure, and "learning from the scriptures" is a verb-object structure; "People will eventually disperse", with people as the subject and "final dispersion" as the predicate, while "Kaigehuan" and "Kaigehuan" as the subject and "Huan" as the predicate. Therefore, this kind of opposition is completely incorrect. However, this antithesis of "Journey to the West Learning Victory Song" actually won 160 "likes"!
For a sentence, sometimes it is really difficult to think about form and content. Especially for those of us who are just having fun. For example, in A Dream of Red Mansions, when people wake up, there will always be an ending. I said that "it's hard to find a mirror" and it is more appropriate in content. Because A Dream of Red Mansions and The Garden in the Mirror are both classic works, and both "dream" and "edge" are nouns, and they are both subjects here, a subject-predicate phrase that constitutes "waking up from a dream" and a subject-predicate phrase that constitutes "strange fate". The following "people eventually disperse" and "traces are hard to find" are "subject+partial formal predicate" to form the subject-predicate structure. In this way, the seven words before and after constitute a complete meaning: a dream of red mansions, after waking up, the people inside are finally exhausted; Mirror flower fate can be called a strange fate, but after all, it is illusory and hard to find traces. These two sentences are closely related to the contents of A Dream of Red Mansions and The Garden of Mirrors.
But my antithesis does not meet the requirements of training. Limited to A Dream of Red Mansions and The Edge of a Mirror Flower, they are both famous and cannot be changed, while "Lou" and "Hua" are both flat-voiced, which is wrong. The sixth word is also wrong. But I am satisfied with the content of my conversation.
Pairing itself is a form of recreation. If it is bound by the "form" of couplets, it may be unpleasant. In that case, whether he is right or not, it may be enough to be happy.