First of all, how are ordinary people and non-ordinary people defined? There is no uniform standard answer, so it is controversial to divide everyone's work into ordinary people and non-ordinary people. Secondly, the definition of part-time job is also very vague. There are ordinary wage earners and senior wage earners. For example, a former working emperor, Tang Jun, who works in Microsoft, is a senior wage earner with an annual salary of tens of millions. Such people can certainly achieve financial freedom within a year or two. However, if we say that wage earners in ordinary factories or those engaged in take-away, express delivery or serving dishes in restaurants want to realize the freedom of wealth. This will be very difficult. Moreover, the definition of financial freedom is also very vague, which means different things to everyone. People living in small and medium-sized cities will realize financial freedom if they can have millions of deposits and own real estate and property rental, but if they are in the first-tier cities of Beijing, Guangzhou and Shenzhen. Wealth does not necessarily belong to financial freedom, because if you only have real estate, then your tens of millions of real estate cannot be realized, because after you change, you lose your residence.

So ordinary people can of course achieve financial freedom through work. But relatively speaking, it is better than those through the heart. It is much more difficult for people to gain financial freedom through wisdom and more effective ways of making money, and some people do it by themselves. Wisdom, for example, wrote a good program. Develop a model. Very easy to use software, large sales, which also achieved financial freedom. Some people seize the cusp of stock trading or futures speculation to make money, that is, they can realize financial freedom in a short time. I feel that most migrant workers just live a well-off life.