Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Futures platform - Mind mapping in different bibliographies
Mind mapping in different bibliographies
Key points of the course:

Understand the difference between silent reading and efficient reading.

Conceptual exercise of understanding the width of field of vision

Grasping the core points of paragraphs with fast reading method and improving reading efficiency with the help of mind map

First extract the mind map from the book, and then review the contents of the book with the help of the mind map.

Learn how different types of books make mind maps through cases.

What is the principle of fast reading?

Fast reading needs the cooperation of the eyes and the brain-the eyes can improve the vision, see more content at a time, the brain runs at high speed, and the meaning of the paragraph is constructed through fragmented information. This way of reading is much better than simple silent reading. On the one hand, reading is faster, on the other hand, coherent understanding of a paragraph will make reading easier.

Where should I put my eyes when reading quickly?

At the beginning of practice, my eyes are focused on the notional words, that is, subject, predicate and object, and I don't look at other components that modify subject, predicate and object. After a period of adaptation, the eyes will naturally fall on the verbs in a sentence, so the reading speed will increase.

When reading quickly, how do you know that you can read the next sentence after reading one sentence?

As long as your reading process is continuous, don't consider whether you have "read" a sentence. When the author writes a book, the former sentence is related to the latter sentence, and the former paragraph is also related to the latter paragraph. It doesn't matter if you don't read individual sentences carefully, the content behind will make you "brain-fill" the content in front. If you can't connect back and forth, you can pause a little and check what you just saw. It won't take long.

Just practicing fast reading, why do you have to do mind mapping?

Simply browsing will improve the reading speed, but there is less information left in the brain after reading. In other words, after reading a book, you may have a blank mind and forget nothing. Mind mapping can make up for this shortcoming, and record the key points while reading. After reading the book, the key points recorded in the mind map will restore the knowledge points you have just read, thus strengthening the effect of your reading.

Why are the mind maps of different books different?

Different types of books have different writing patterns. For example, dry goods books are generally written according to the logical framework, so the mind map of dry goods books is more structured. Fiction books are generally arranged in chronological order and plot order, so the corresponding mind map will be more linear and coherent.

Is the guide map the main point of the record?

Recording the main points is just a "task" of mind mapping. When doing mind mapping, we should also pay attention to induction and refinement, and summarize zero knowledge points and information. In addition, when making mind maps, you should also integrate your own thinking, such as a mind map of a novel. In addition to retelling the plot, we need to dig out the connotation and significance behind the novel.

Next, I'll tell you about the disassembly method of prose:

The content of prose is very scattered. When I open a book, I don't know which article is the key. This is a headache for the author who first wrote the manuscript. I feel that when I meet a hedgehog, how to deal with it is very difficult. I remember I said an idiom "taken out of context". Although this is a derogatory term, we should open the books, especially the prose. The simplified version of the manuscript is only a few thousand words. It is impossible to explain all aspects of a book. Then we have to choose the core content to refine our point of view. The meaning of asking for is the meaning of prose collection. The essence of what we understand when reading, of course, everyone's reading experience and understanding are different.

Below, I mainly take San Mao's "The Story of the Sahara" as the introduction to talk about how to disassemble prose.

Sanmao used to be a ferryman in the youth of many readers, a poem and a distant place in our hearts. She traveled around the world with our dreams, seeing all beings and the world for us, and letting us see ourselves in her words. From this point of view, we can easily find that one idea that can be extracted from this book is: "Expand infinite width and depth with limited life."

San Mao said, "I will taste the process of life, whether it is Chun Xue or green bean curd, before I go to trip worthwhile!" "Only seen heaven and earth, will have a vision, but vision is not enough. Only by understanding the suffering of all beings can we understand our own sweetness.

Sanmao gave up his civilized life in Taiwan Province Province, traveled around the world, went to poor and backward North Africa, crossed the Sahara Desert, and lived in Western Sahara with Jose for a long time. She is expanding infinite width and depth with limited life.

In the Sahara desert, she got along with the local people, experienced wars, experienced disputes between different tribes, and witnessed the life of a lowly slave without dignity. She deeply understands the sinister complexity of human nature and the survival law of the jungle, but regardless of the hearts of the ancients, she is still merciful and full of love for the world. She doesn't look down on the poor, but is compassionate and caring, hates war, calls for peace and loves peace. If she hadn't experienced the vicissitudes of war, didn't know the desolation of life and didn't know how to cherish every quiet daily life. These are all manifestations of the depth of her life. You might as well read it carefully, dig out the materials in the book, extract them, and profoundly demonstrate this view.

The world is so big and Sanmao's wandering life is wonderful. We must really want to go out and have a look. Go ahead, explore the width and depth of life, let your dreams lead and connect your footprints into lifelines. The world is in the first step, and the first step is life.

Of course, the above viewpoints can be placed at the end of the three viewpoints as a sublimation of this book.

After reading The Story of the Sahara, many readers are deeply impressed by the love between San Mao and Jose. They are moved by her love across national boundaries and always want to write their love. But you know, their love is badly written on the internet. If we write it, we must explore new ideas. If there is nothing new, then don't write about her love from three angles. Of course, at least one point of view should be used to refine their love story. As for how to refine, it is best to find another way.

Sanmao's life is a wandering life, all his life in the distance, all his life in scavenging. She and Jose are a game of chess under fate. Between ups and downs, success or failure has been decided. They missed it for six years, and God made up for their desert life in seven years. Then, only Sanmao was left, and she spent her whole life bearing the pain of saying goodbye to the past.

Can be abstracted as, love is not the distance, but the distance in the heart. Narration can start from their trivial life, from Jose's thoughts, and from the national concept.

That is to say, to disassemble a book, you have to read a lot of books and consult a lot of materials, and then condense the materials and stories in the book and explain the views thoroughly, so as to attract people. This process of refining essence, sorting out materials and concentrating thoughts and emotions is also a process of expanding thinking, improving cognition and enriching the soul, from which we realize that writing is really a meaningful thing.

As for the third point of view, it can be extracted from how Sanmao overcame the hard life in the Sahara and from the stories of those she contacted, such as: compassion because of love; Life needs courage and wisdom; People with free souls will never wait alone. In short, every step of the Sahara can inspire Sanmao's profound understanding of life.

She has met all kinds of people: a group of backward and ignorant Sahrawi women; At the age of ten, he was sold by his family at a high price and was robbed of his virginity by violence; An innocent child, a young salon deeply in love. ?

Sanmao's writing never deliberately pursues a certain skill and style, and everything seems dull and natural. ? But in her writing style, there is infinity, which may be a higher skill and style. Sanmao's writing style has always been dull in my impression, and his richness and charm also come from this dullness. I was always curious about her life, so I fell in love with her books. I think this is why everyone loves Sanmao.

The Story of the Sahara is a collection of essays and novels. The narrative story is shocking, novel, dreamy and touching, from which we can learn a lot, so I won't repeat them one by one. Her other books, too, can be interpreted from many angles and should not follow suit.

In short, to read the disassembled prose, we must first understand the background (the author's life experience, growth environment, story background, etc. ) and clarify the form; Second, we should shuttle between the lines and taste the feelings; Third, we should refine the story reader (this person, including the author, story characters and so on. ); Fourth, we should grasp God through form.

Many students split prose, but they feel that they can't grasp the key points. Why? The more you try to cover everything, the worse you write. You might as well grasp its essence, but refining can write a good article. The important thing is that it depends on your perspective.

Extract three main points and then add arguments around the argument. Opening a manuscript is to respect original ideas.

My feeling:

"Disassemble a book, we have to read a lot of books, access to a lot of information, and then condense the materials and stories in the book and explain the views thoroughly, so as to attract people. This process of refining essence, sorting out materials and concentrating thoughts and emotions is also a process of expanding thinking, improving cognition and enriching the soul, from which we realize that writing is really a meaningful thing. "

What beautiful words and rigorous thinking. Benefited a lot. I was deeply moved by the above words.

My actions:

I also realized this before. My statement is that we should form our own knowledge system and elaborate it from multiple angles. Views should be unique. It may have something to do with the books I usually pay attention to. I prefer dry books relatively, which suppresses my romantic nature. My subconscious mind refuses to read essays and novels, feeling it is a waste of time. I'm more interested in philosophy and conceptual things. However, sometimes the feelings I get from my feelings have the style of prose poetry. Therefore, the first thing I have to do is to calm down, read more essays, novels and poems, and accumulate my own cultural accomplishment. In this way, when expressing the output, it can be meaningful and more temperature. Otherwise, the article will unconsciously cause the effect of "preaching". I remember that once my friends gave me a nickname "Liu Jiaoshou", which meant that when I opened my mouth, I made a long speech, and it was all arguments.