Text: How to Fill in the Application Form of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 2007-06-27 17:06 The basic requirement and principle of writing the application form is the style of combining expository and argumentative writing, and its purpose is to persuade the reviewers of the application form to agree with the applicant's application plan. The applicant should be able to make the reviewer understand the main contents of the application: peers can "understand"; Small peers can see the level. The applicant should stand on the judge's point of view, so that the application is focused, clear, fluent, concise and specific, systematic and comprehensive, with sufficient arguments, strict logic and convincing. Highlights: content (main highlight) and form (bold emphasis); Explain clearly (abbreviation, research background). 1. Project title and summary table title-make the finishing point (stand out), correct and accurate, clear and clear (unambiguous information), but not too big or too small. Summary table-correct and accurate, with no blank items and true signature. Summary: Introduce the objectives, methods, contents, purposes and significance. Chinese and English subject words are accurate and general. Second, the argument is based on research significance-important scientific significance or important scientific and technological issues in the national economy. The topic selection determines its scientific significance. Basic theory and application of this discipline, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of major diseases. The innovation of academic thought-explicit innovation is the focus of this part, and it is also the feature and soul of the whole application. How to innovate: The key to find out the past and present problems is to study the risks on the basis of feasibility through the innovation of research strategies and angles, methods and means. The importance of the problem is the premise, and research and innovation are the foundation. Project basis-full and scientific. Full: comprehensive and in-depth; Strong scientific nature: in line with the scientific spirit and principles, the inference is logical, and the selection and significance analysis are based on objective and representative research results. Analysis of the research status at home and abroad-clear, accurate and comprehensive. Clarity: Clarify important representative research results and important research processes. Accurate and comprehensive analysis: pay attention to the selection of primary and secondary documents, and quote the main documents to reflect the progress. Comprehensive analysis of the same, similar and contradictory documents as this study. The same results and opinions, appropriate praise conclusions, and objective evaluation of different opinions. "Review the past and learn the new", systematically, comprehensively and deeply analyze and understand the problems studied, and add scientific imagination to innovate. The basis of project establishment and the analysis of research status at home and abroad serve the goal of innovative research on major issues. Winning the bid: 50-60% of the arguments are written successfully. Third, the research goal (why, why)-clear, the research content that can achieve the expected goal (what, what)-suitable scope: determine the suitable research scope according to factors such as time, capital, technology and manpower. Focus: determine the focus of research and concentrate all resources on breakthrough research. Choose the key questions accurately. Accurately analyze key issues and choose methods (howtodo it, how to do it: how to achieve the goal, what to rely on). Advanced and technological innovation. The latest concrete methods are innovative in some aspects or as a whole. In the final analysis, solving scientific problems is a matter of method. At least, this is a feasible method. Technical route-(how to do it, how to do it: working procedure, why to study the content in what time sequence by the selected method)-reasonable and feasible: in line with the laws of scientific research, the project is innovative-innovative, belonging to groundbreaking work: exploratory attempt, with groundbreaking significance. Feasibility analysis-innovation, science may be promising, but it may not be feasible. Feasibility refers to the possibility of completing the research content and achieving the research goal under the existing conditions. Feasibility analysis should be comprehensive. Experimental scheme-take the content as the central clue and comprehensively describe the content, method and technical route. You can also write the technical route together with the experimental scheme. The annual plan and the expected progress-specific, clear, there is room-highlight, briefly and systematically introduce the expected research results. Four. The accumulation of research foundation and work related to this project-preferably the deepening of the original work, followed by the accumulation of related work. Experimental conditions-owning or cooperating with the State Key Laboratory. The members of the project team-the research echelon is complete and the research strength is strong. Applicants and main participating members: resumes reflect their achievements, abilities, work accumulation and the possibility of completing the project, and pay attention to the correlation between resumes and research. 5. Reasonable budget allocation-fill in according to the Measures for Property Management of Projects Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation, and pay attention to the management fee not exceeding the standard (5%); Pay attention to the correlation between instrument cost and experimental conditions. 6. Reasonable introduction of other research projects undertaken by the applicant-None: The applicant's strength is poor: It reflects that the applicant has too much strength: Can the applicant's research energy ensure the completion of this research? 7. The projects undertaken by the applicant by the National Natural Science Foundation of China are not overfulfilled-the quality of completion is excellent: there are many papers or the quality is high; At least basically complete the plan. 8. The applicant promises that his signature is consistent with the summary table. 9. Recommend the opinions of middle-level professionals, and pay attention to the authority of recommending experts and the objectivity of recommendation. 10. Review and guarantee of the applicant and the cooperative unit. Pay attention to objectivity. Pay attention to the opinions and official seals of the cooperative units. The overall innovation of the project is the key academic innovation. The novelty of research objectives leads to the innovation of research methods and technology, and the technical route is innovative. Strive for the project to be rated as excellent and give priority to funding.