However, this activity also caused netizens to question that they were also poor students with different birthday dates and changed their names. There is even a child whose birthday is "February 29th, 2009", which does not exist.
A few days ago, the "You were born on the same day" fundraising activity has closed the donation channel.
Relevant investigations and public opinion doubts continue.
This charity activity is organized by the decibel fund, which belongs to the zero decibel platform and can be searched on Baidu Encyclopedia, but the amount of information is very small.
With "zero decibel non-profit organization" as the key word, most of the searched terms are:
Narada Foundation's "Face-beating" zero decibel public welfare organization.
This "You were born on the same day" activity can be said to be anticlimactic, regardless of whether its fund-raising behavior is tricky. It is enough to call it a failed activity just because of the disorder and lack of transparency of information.
Relying on the strength of the circle of friends, this "You were born on the same day" activity is very popular. The author's circle of friends saw almost four or five developments in this regard yesterday. Friends donated it and then spread it. I ordered it, too The page is concise and there is not much information.
Only in the author's circle of friends, at least unknown friends participated in the donation activities, and its popularity can be imagined:
At noon on the 24th, the fundraising ended that day. According to the activity page, "This activity raised a total of 2,555,898 yuan (editor's note: 2.55 million yuan), which will all be used for one-year living allowance for poor students in Zhenxiong County, Yunnan Province."
One yuan per person, which means at least 2.55 million people participated in this activity.
And according to my observation, this activity will not last more than three days from its launch. This level of communication is really terrible.
The main reasons for this spread are:
1, gimmicks:
Donating money to the other party born on the same day makes the donation feel formal, plus photos and short personal information, which stimulates the impulse.
2. Amount:
Anyone can donate one yuan, and the small amount makes many donors not think too much.
3. Passion:
After 80 s and 90 s, they are a group of people who are relatively free from charity. Limited by their own economic conditions, their participation in charity is obviously not as good as that after the 1960s and 1970s. This one-yuan donation catered to the social needs of 8090 in form and inspired its enthusiasm. This is also the reason why this activity can spread wildly in the circle of friends, and its form caters to social needs.
(Zero decibel is the same photo and two kinds of information that people question)
Today's zero decibel has fallen into a quagmire. At the moment when the credibility of non-profit organizations is slowly picking up, zero decibel once again hurts people's feelings.
From the exposure of two photos with the same identity information, Du Nan Fund issued a statement saying that it has never cooperated with Zero dB, and Stone Hammer Zero dB claimed to cooperate with Du Nan Fund:
Narada Foundation has never cooperated with Zero dB, and has not authorized the organization to use the logo of Narada Foundation. The organization's unauthorized use of the narada Foundation logo has damaged the reputation of our association. I will condemn this infringement and have made solemn representations to Mr. Wang Li, the founder of Zero dB. At present, Zero dB has removed the Logo of narada foundation from its "Cooperation Organization" column in official website, so as not to cause further misunderstanding to our society and the public.
No matter how the charity event with zero decibel finally disposes of the money, it is difficult to recover the decrease of people's trust in charitable organizations and non-profit organizations.
Why do our non-profit organizations always have accidents? At this rate, will we dare to donate money in the future?
The most impressive trust crisis of China charity should be the "Guo Meimei Incident". After the "Guo Meimei Incident", the online survey results showed that about 80% netizens said they would not donate to the Red Cross in the future.
The huge statue of Soong Ching Ling built by Soong Ching Ling Foundation in 13 was also controversial, and half of the statue was eventually demolished.
With the events of Guo Meimei's Red Cross Society, sky-high meals, Shangdemen in china charity federation and Song Dynasty, etc. 20 1 1 became the accountability year of charity, involving many giant charitable organizations and having great influence. 20 1 1 In the whole year, the total social donation decreased by 18. 1%, and the donation income of China Red Cross plummeted from 30120,000 yuan to 558 million yuan.
Although there are twists and turns, it does not mean that China's philanthropy has given up eating because of choking, even though the credibility of charitable organizations is often lacking.
Especially after the Charity Law was promulgated in September, 20 16, 1 year, China's charity has ushered in new vitality.