Every time the Guggenheim Art Foundation has a different flavor, it was made by masters before, and each one is more eye-catching. This time, the public bidding is not obsessed with the master, but the result looks ordinary, not as iconic and creative as before. But opening to the public is also a good thing, giving more people a chance to think about the possibility of art galleries and exhibits.

As for art galleries, artists have the most say. They are real users. They show their works here, but they don't like boring indoor space, because the architecture of the art museum is great and beautiful. I heard an artist say that there is no difference between exhibiting in an art gallery and my studio. Why should I go there? Then the exhibition in the art museum should be because the art museum building itself is very famous. So the conclusion may be that the art museum needs to be a landmark building, a large space that can carry all kinds of works of art, and its location is excellent.

On the other hand, the users of art galleries should be everyone. Without people who appreciate art, art galleries have no meaning. In fact, the focus is on people who appreciate art, and the attraction of art galleries should be beautiful appearance and easy access. The most critical factor in the strength of art itself is that people can stay in the art gallery area. This kind of stay has a certain relationship with artists on the surface, but actually has a direct relationship with architects. The internal needs of the building are very interesting. Originally, appreciating art was a hiking trip with uncertain time, so there was no need for too many grievances and surprises everywhere. Indoor space also needs a lot of free space for people to stay and relax, and outdoor space needs many places suitable for people to stay. Simply put, a good art museum is actually an interesting urban open space, not a house.