. First of all, putting most of the family wealth into various foundations will not affect the domination of wealth, but also successfully realize the invisibility of wealth. China has many restrictions on foundations, but in those countries, the presidential election needs the support of consortia, so is the money of this foundation different from theirs? Plus the consortium that supported the president after he took office, a rising tide lifts all boats. It can be said that part of the country's money is their own money and belongs to the bankers themselves. It can be said that their money is also the money of the bank boss. When the money you own is also someone else's, but you have complete control and right to use all the money, you will also announce your money to get the lottery. There is an old saying in China that a monkey without a tiger in the mountain is called overlord. How come there are no tigers in the mountains? As long as everyone knows the power of tigers, that's enough. There is no need to compete with monkeys all day. Isn't this self-deprecating? Just like there are gangs in China, but have you seen them? Do you know where they are? But sometimes you are still afraid to meet such people, and such people always exist. This is why prestige is hidden. That's the way to keep money. Secondly, when you have trillions, what are you most afraid of? Fear of loss, there are various kinds of loss, such as assassination, coercion, betrayal (not to mention impossible, your best partner may cut you), so what can you do to avoid losing? Rockefeller lived for more than 90 years and operated for more than 50 years. It was not until he was over 80 years old that he realized that losing the best thing was "not getting it", so he set up a foundation and a bank to serve the people below, so that all people thought that what they had was only one-off, but after that, money had been confused, and it was difficult to tell how much money there was. At this time, everyone in the family can get money from what they need, and the money to meet the needs belongs to everyone in the family. Then at this time, what can the people who let you do do kill you, and the wealth is still everyone's, no more or less, which also improves the cohesion of the family. When a person can apply for anything he wants, then what can buy you off to deal with a family member? So at the end of Forbes' statistics, whose do you think this belongs to, the masses? Family? How do you divide this?