At present, there are four members in the preparatory group of the Science and Technology Anti-counterfeiting Fund, all of whom are well-known academic counterfeiters in China, including He Zuoxiu, academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guo Zhengyi, former director of China Institute of Popular Science, Si Manan, a folk counterfeiter, and Yuan Zhong, assistant dean of China Academy of Medical Sciences (retired later). Lawyer Peng Jian is currently the secretary of the organization. The money raised will be used for the personal protection of science and technology counterfeiters and the reward of relevant clues. These funds are not only used to ensure the safety of the party, but also used to include other scientific and technological counterfeiters in the protected list and give support after publicity and consultation. Unpublished details
Luo Yonghao, another folk counterfeiter in China, questioned:
1. If there is no registered and unqualified Public Offering of Fund, you can report it to the civil affairs department. But on Fang's fund website, this is a donation initiated by an individual, and it is a "fund" rather than a "fund", so it will be difficult to report it in the civil affairs department. However, some lawyers pointed out that funds used for public welfare purposes such as counterfeiting cannot be initiated and accepted by individuals, so this "fund" is also problematic.
2. If the counterfeit money is not Public Offering of Fund, then everyone's donation is an individual donation. However, everyone donated it to lawyer Peng, and lawyer Peng donated it to Fang Zhouzihua. Both of them have to pay high personal income tax. I suspect that they have not paid taxes, so they must report to the tax authorities. 3. When launching the Public Offering of Fund or raising funds, the sponsors promised to supervise the account, but now Fang Peng's lawyers refuse to disclose the details of the account, and the donor has reason to suspect that Fang Peng has committed fraud and can call the police.
Suspected of misappropriating donations
On February 30th, 2065438+0515, Fang was exposed by a well-known CCTV reporter on the Internet that his lawyer was suspected of "defrauding" netizens' money, and then fell into criticism.
After 20 10 was attacked, his lawyer Peng set up a "security fund" to attract donations from netizens in order to protect the party. However, it is claimed that after the establishment of the security fund, Fang's lawyer embezzled and misappropriated the fund to buy cars and houses.
On February 27th, 65438, he wrote a long article in Weibo, exposing how Fang's lawyer embezzled public funds to buy a car for his law firm. No.29 describes the whole process of buying a car in detail.
At present, Fang has not denied the fact that his lawyer bought a car with a "deposit".
It is believed that Fang's social security fund is suspected of fraud, and the main evidences are as follows:
Peng Jian claimed many times on the Internet that the account of donated funds was managed by a special person. Even if it is, it is not easy to transfer money. Bank cards and passbooks are managed by special personnel. But this bank card he doesn't have can magically swipe his card to buy a car for his private law firm. This shows that Peng Jian has been cheating donors in the management of donation accounts for a long time.
Evidence shows that the security funds donated by thousands of well-intentioned netizens were donated by Peng Jian, the manager who directly misappropriated the car. It is such a person, but Fang has always endorsed his promise, saying that he will not use a penny of security funds, and his motives are suspicious.
Peng Jian set up a security fund on August 3 1 20 10, and bought a car on September 20, and netizens donated only 20 days. At this time and since then, Fang has been calling on netizens to donate money to the security fund online. Wang Zhian believes that this is the reason why Heping insists that the security fund expenditure cannot be made public.
The car purchased by Peng Jian was invoiced by Beijing Huahuan Law Firm. The nature of this law firm is private, and the owner is Peng Jian, but this invoice can deduct the tax payable by Huahuan Law Firm. Whether Peng Jian's behavior is suspected of intentional tax evasion has not been appraised by professionals.