The attribute of this scientific problem refers to four attributes: encouraging exploration, highlighting originality, focusing on the frontier, finding a new way, stimulating demand, breaking through the bottleneck, * * * guiding, and cross-accommodation.

What is the nature of your scientific question, and then why?

So I think: if you choose 1, it means that your topic is very original, and others have never done it or thought about it; Choosing 2 means that someone else did it, but it was not good enough. My idea is more effective than theirs. Option 3 means that everyone needs the research content of this topic, which has great application prospects, but there is one problem that has not been solved, and my topic can be solved. If you choose 4, you will say ... if you choose 4, you will say that your research needs several directions, involving physics and chemistry.

—————————————————————————————————————

I wrote anonymously for fear of being scolded, but I didn't expect to get some recognition. The following are my personal thoughts and supplements in the past two years.

Personally, the first four words of the attribute refer to the positioning of scientific problems, and the last four words refer to the positioning of your solution.

The common forms are: first, we should know what our scientific problems are, which is "encouraging exploration" that no one has discovered before, "creating new roads" that no one has done well, "demand traction" that the country urgently needs, or "* * * sexual orientation" that many places need; Secondly, say what your solution is like and point out whether it is original/unique/original. . . . .

What is the problem in specific scientific and what is the solution? Must be written in an abstract way. Writing the fund itself is mainly to clarify the key problem to be solved in your book (the most important one, and there may be several other technical details), and then it is very simple to consider the positioning of this problem.