According to national laws and regulations, a certain proportion of all raised funds can be used for expenses such as organization management and personnel salaries, and generally this proportion cannot be higher than 10%.
In foreign countries, there are many non-governmental public welfare organizations, and there is no strict requirement on the proportion of their management funds. China has some.
Everyone insists on what they rely on to make money, that is, relying on institutional management fees to eat.
This is very reasonable, because if we want to raise funds for non-governmental public welfare organizations, make good use of funds and solve practical social problems, we need a professional team with strong comprehensive ability and strong professionalism. Such people are scarce everywhere, and there must be certain treatment to ensure the professionalism and stability of the team. Moreover, only professional public welfare practitioners will be legally responsible for the correct use of raised funds. You think the money you donated will be spent by a group of volunteers who didn't get a penny. In case Hua Cuo dies, how can you hold him responsible? Responsibility and power must be equal. If you don't get paid, you can completely shirk your responsibility. Who can insist on taking responsibility without paying? Also ensure professionalism.
Something like that.
Adopt it.