SCP was investigated in March, 20021year. From the report, we can see that most of the offline physical products of SCP Foundation recently appeared in Hunan, Shaanxi, Shanghai and Zhejiang were produced by a company from Zhejiang. On May 26, a salesperson of the company said that the company started to produce "SCP Foundation" related products in April, mainly for primary and secondary school students, and they have been sold to many places in the country. Sales staff said that the sales of the "SCP Foundation" card sets are hot at present, and said that its contents will not have a negative impact on students. A salesperson said that the sales of offline products are relatively hot at present, mainly for primary and secondary school students. "

So it seems that most of the companies mentioned in the report are this one. If the salesperson in the report is not lying, the company started to produce SCP-related products in April, and SCP was investigated in March. Therefore, the closure of SCP is probably not directly related to the sales of this SCP card [of course, it is unknown whether it is because of other SCP-related products sold before March or because the SCP products sold by this company since April have led to the further closure of SCP. Personally, however, the reason why SCP is blocked is mainly because of SCP-related videos. But speaking of this, I also want to say a few words about SCP-related products: obviously, the content of the foundation basically follows the CC-BY-SA protocol (a few do not, such as the pictures of SCP 173). This means that anyone can use the content in SCP that follows the CC-BY-SA protocol for secondary creation/commercialization without the consent of the creator, but only if they also follow the CC-BY-SA protocol and give an appropriate signature. Of course, it doesn't mean that as long as the content in SCP is involved, it must be marked with CC and signature, and there is such a thing as "fair use". The following text is quoted from official website's authorization guide: "You can freely create and share videos based on SCP, but you must distribute your videos under CC license (except for fair use). Most of the content about SCP on Youtube, whether reading the audio of SCP articles or the original animation based on SCP, is not reasonably used, because they either completely copy SCP articles or are completely based on SCP's worldview. Give an example of reasonable use: a video of SCP reading, which only contains a small amount or does not contain SCP excerpts, is definitely reasonable use, so it does not need to be released under the permission of CC. " .

The key point is that it seems that many SCP-related products have neither declared that they follow the CC-BY-SA protocol nor given proper signatures (of course, I'm not so sure, but at least I went to Taobao to search SCP products and saw that several stores have not declared that they follow the CC protocol and signatures). Then I'll talk about this SCP card of Kameng Company separately. Whether to follow the CC agreement and signature is not mentioned for the time being (anyway, I went to Taobao to see several stores that sell this card, and I didn't explain that I followed the CC agreement and signature), but even if I leave this aside, it is actually quite outrageous not to talk about this card. Because its card actually has a SCP-6789 siren head. ......