QDII fund is the most volatile fund, because it belongs to overseas investment products, and overseas stock markets have no restrictions on ups and downs, and the daily gains and losses can be unlimited. Therefore, the impact of net worth will exceed all funds of A shares. Why is it not obvious now? It can only be said that since its issuance, overseas stock markets have been bad, falling and falling, so everyone only saw him shrink seriously and never saw him rise. In fact, if the fund company itself is strong enough to operate well and the external market goes well, his increase is also amazing. I believe that as long as America's subprime mortgage can be eased slowly, it will go well and other countries will recover. At that time, the five QDII products issued will be divided, and the net value of a good fund management team will rise sharply.

The rest are domestic A-share funds. I think ETF is the most volatile, because it directly tracks stock indexes and belongs to authentic index funds. In 28, the stock index will maintain the box oscillation, that is, the plunge that everyone saw in January will often happen, slowly rise, grow higher, and then plummet back. Then this is the trend of ETF funds that passively track the stock index. In the second half of January, the decline of ETFs ranked first, but on February 4th, the stock index rebounded, and all the two ETFs in my hand had daily limit. I believe that no other open-end fund has had this trend.

The second is the index fund in LOF fund, because LOF is one of the types of funds, and it is also subdivided into stock type, hybrid type, index type and so on. The reason is the same as ETF. Oh, I won't write more.

As for the stock type or the active allocation type, it depends on which fund it is, because different fund companies and different fund management teams have different investment styles, which will lead to different net value fluctuations. You can't simply distinguish according to the type of fund.