Through the fund ranking, we can know the investment income level of different funds in a specific period of time, and help fund investors choose the fund objects to invest in. Of course, because fund investment is a long-term process, it is best to refer to the historical performance of the fund company where you choose the fund. In addition, to dynamically look at this ranking, the fund's income will be affected by some external factors in a certain period of time, so compare more when choosing funds. The ranking of Tian Tian funds is mainly based on the quantitative ranking in the statistical sense. Morningstar's comprehensive evaluation of the fund is stronger, and the five-star rating has become the industry benchmark. Performance ranking generally refers to the recent performance of the same type of fund, and the summary ranking of fund performance should refer to the comprehensive ranking of historical performance and net value growth, and be weighted.

The former is suitable for varieties whose short-term returns are greatly influenced by currencies and bonds, while the latter is suitable for active equity fund products that long-term investors need to have a deep understanding of long-term returns and risks. Investors can inquire about the past performance, internal management mechanism, financial resources and researcher strength of fund management companies. For example, some funds' portfolios are managed by a fund management team including many fund managers and researchers, while others are managed by one or two fund managers. Obviously, the latter form of investment management is greatly influenced by personal factors. Therefore, once you know the news of the change of fund managers, you should pay attention. For another example, the management companies of several funds with top incomes in open-end funds are backed by powerful researchers, which have made great contributions to these funds.