For example, the Singapore government requires all enterprises and institutions to pay skills development funds to the state. Anyone who conducts employee training can apply to the state for skills development funds, and the training will get more funds. If you don't train, you will pay the skills development fund for nothing, which has stimulated the training of enterprises and institutions in Singapore to some extent.
The funds used by the US federal government for public employment services and vocational training mainly come from unemployment insurance (called employment security fund in Canada). In addition, the United States also spends 3% of its budget on employment services. As one of the important strategies of employment training. In order to encourage small business training, at present, the US government is trying to encourage small and medium-sized enterprises to jointly organize training by increasing some financial support. In addition, the US and Canadian governments mainly use the training and employment projects formulated by the government in the use of training funds, and the company's training can only get training funds if it participates in these projects; This investment method brings the characteristics of subsidy or "purchase" and is quite flexible. What projects the government takes and what talents it trains are tantamount to giving training institutions a kind of market information. This practice not only saves money than the quota, but also solves the problem of training institutions adapting to the market to a certain extent.