Is the purchase restriction fund good or bad?
Funds that are restricted in purchase are more for the long-term stability of fund performance, because when the fund is restricted in purchase, it is very likely that the fund will be so hot that many investors will snap it up.
However, in order to prevent a large amount of funds from coming in in in the short term, the fund manager fails to allocate assets in time, which leads to the decrease of the expected income of fund holders, and the fund company will limit the subscription, but this is not necessarily a bad thing, but to ensure the interests of everyone and the fund company.
Is the fund purchase restriction good or bad?
It is neither bad nor bad to limit the purchase of funds. If you must define it, it belongs to the mid-range. Because the main reason for the fund's purchase restriction is that too many people buy it, the market is too hot, and a large amount of funds enter the fund, which affects the normal operation of the fund and can only be managed through purchase restriction.
However, it is worth noting that the bigger the fund, the better. The bigger the fund, the more difficult it is to manage. In addition, the fund's purchase restriction is due to good past performance, scarce products and too many buyers. It's time to be rational.
Summary: The restricted funds are more for the long-term stability of fund performance, because when the funds are restricted, it is likely that the funds are so hot that many investors will snap up. In addition, it is neither bad nor bad to limit funds. If you must define it, it belongs to the mid-range.