Qianfagai Investment [2022] No.450
Provincial units, municipal (state) Development and Reform Commission (bureau), Finance Bureau, county (city, district, SAR) Development and Reform Bureau, Finance Bureau:
With the consent of the provincial people's government, the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of Decision-making and Evaluation of Investment Projects of Guizhou Provincial Government (Provisional) are hereby printed and distributed to you, please implement them carefully.
Attachment: Detailed Rules for the Implementation of Decision-making Evaluation of Government Investment Projects in Guizhou Province (Provisional)
Guizhou provincial development and reform commission? Guizhou Provincial Department of Finance
June 2022 14
Detailed Rules for the Implementation of Decision Evaluation of Government Investment Projects in Guizhou Province (Provisional)
Chapter I General Provisions
Rule number one In order to strengthen the management of decision-making evaluation of government investment projects, improve the decision-making evaluation procedures and improve the quality of decision-making, these rules are formulated in accordance with the Measures for the Administration of Government Investment Projects in Guizhou Province (DecreeNo. 202nd of Guizhou Provincial People's Government) and relevant regulations.
Rule number two All government investment projects should be evaluated before making decisions. In accordance with the regulations, government investment projects submitted to the state for examination and approval or applying for state subsidy funds need to be matched with the financial budget of our province, and decision-making evaluation procedures should also be performed. Operation, maintenance and decoration projects shall be implemented in accordance with relevant government procurement procedures.
Rule three. The budgetary funds in government investment projects mainly include:
(a) the general public budget fixed assets investment projects and other special construction funds;
(two) the construction funds arranged by the government fund budget;
(three) the construction funds obtained by the government according to law;
(four) the construction funds arranged by the state-owned capital operating budget;
(five) other funds included in the government budget management.
Article 4? Projects that have been approved for filing and applied for financial investment shall, in accordance with the principle of marketization, perform decision-making evaluation and relevant examination and approval procedures in accordance with the provisions of these rules. If construction has already started, the basic construction procedures of the project can no longer be fulfilled. The financial capital investment mentioned in this article does not include government investment funds, investment subsidies, loan interest subsidies, and operational management funds such as feasibility gap subsidies and government fees for government and social capital cooperation (PPP) projects that have been completed and put into operation.
Article 5? For government investment projects with multi-channel funding sources, in principle, the department that examines and approves the feasibility study report of the project should take the lead to carry out decision-making evaluation, and it can also guide the relevant localities or departments to carry out decision-making evaluation according to the principle of "appropriate powers and responsibilities", and the results of relevant decision-making evaluation will serve as an important basis for project examination and approval.
Article 6? Decision evaluation should be carried out before the project is established, and the project unit should strengthen the preliminary work of the project and provide relevant materials that meet the depth requirements of the feasibility study report (pre-feasibility study) as an important reference and basis for evaluation and demonstration.
For government investment projects under the following circumstances, decision-making evaluation should be made before the project feasibility study report is approved:
(a) the project proposal is no longer approved;
(two) the project proposal and feasibility study report for examination and approval;
(three) has been included in the relevant national and provincial planning.
Projects that have been established before October 8, 20021,10/kloc-0 may not perform the decision-making evaluation procedure.
Article 7? According to the needs of the work, the evaluation and demonstration review can be carried out at the same time as the relevant review work. After the decision-making evaluation is passed, the project approval department shall reply the project proposal or feasibility study report as required. Project decision evaluation cannot replace the basic construction procedure of the project. In the process of examining and approving the project proposal or feasibility study report, if there are major changes such as the adjustment ratio of the construction scheme to the evaluation and demonstration reaches one third or more, the expected floating of funds exceeds 65,438+00% or more, and the financial contribution cannot be fully paid in time, the decision-making and evaluation procedures should be re-performed according to the authority.
Article 8? Projects included in the annual plan of government investment at the corresponding level shall perform decision-making evaluation procedures, and in principle, they shall be affordable projects at the corresponding level. For the projects with higher-level subsidy funds, it is necessary to ensure the reliable source of matching funds at the same level, and clarify how to implement the specific measures of project funding sources when the higher-level subsidy funds are not in place in time and in full. If the source of funds is not clear, it shall not pass the decision-making evaluation and shall not be included in the annual plan of government investment at the same level.
Article 9? For government investment projects with a wide range of points, simple technical scheme, single construction content and a total investment of less than 5 million yuan, evaluation and demonstration work can be carried out in batches.
Chapter II Decision-making Evaluation Mechanism
Article 10? Development, reform and finance departments at all levels shall, jointly with relevant industry authorities, be responsible for the evaluation and demonstration of government investment projects at the corresponding level, and make decisions according to regulations.
City, county development and reform, the financial sector in conjunction with the competent authorities of the industry to hold an assessment meeting in a timely manner, focusing on the assessment opinions issued by the intermediary agencies, combined with the review opinions of the competent authorities of the industry, jointly issued a comprehensive assessment report. The comprehensive evaluation report shall be submitted to the executive meeting of the people's government at the same level for deliberation and decision. Relevant time limit requirements and upgrade review requirements shall be implemented in accordance with relevant regulations.
Article 11? The Provincial Development and Reform Commission and the Provincial Department of Finance shall, jointly with the provincial industry authorities, establish a joint meeting system for decision-making evaluation of government investment projects (hereinafter referred to as the provincial joint meeting), which is mainly responsible for the decision-making evaluation of provincial government investment projects and the evaluation and demonstration of city and county evaluation projects. The office of the joint meeting of the province is located in the provincial development and Reform Commission, and is responsible for daily work such as decision-making, evaluation and management.
For provincial government investment projects, the project unit shall submit the relevant materials and evaluation application that meet the depth requirements of the feasibility study report (pre-feasibility study) to the provincial joint meeting before each month 10.
The joint meeting of the province will hold an evaluation demonstration meeting in the middle and late of each month to listen to the evaluation opinions of the intermediary agencies and jointly issue a comprehensive evaluation report in combination with the review opinions of the competent departments of the industry. In accordance with the provisions of the need to report to the executive meeting of the provincial people's government for deliberation and decision-making, or major projects that have a significant impact on economic and social development and involve major public interests or vital interests of the public. Provincial Development and Reform Commission, the Provincial Department of Finance that it is necessary to report to the executive meeting of the provincial people's government for deliberation and decision-making shall be submitted to the executive meeting of the provincial people's government for deliberation.
Article 12? The debt ratio of the county-level government is 300% or above, the "three guarantees" guarantee gap or the default of the principal and interest of the national debt. The executive meeting of the people's government of the city (state) deliberated and decided, and the results were reported quarterly to the Provincial Development and Reform Commission and the Provincial Department of Finance for the record.
Chapter III Main Contents of Decision Evaluation
Article 13 The evaluation and demonstration shall focus on the necessity of project implementation, the feasibility of economy and technology, the rationality of construction scale and project cost, the reliability of funding sources and financial affordability, and evaluate whether the project belongs to the public welfare field, whether the expected income is in line with reality, whether the new project causes the "three guarantees" gap, whether the fund balance scheme is feasible, energy consumption, possible major risks and social stability risks of major projects.
If the total investment of provincial government investment projects does not exceed 30 million yuan, there is no need to assess the financial affordability and fund balance plan.
Article 14 The review of project upgrading should focus on whether the source of project funds and financing scheme are reasonable, whether the self-owned funds are true, whether the financial contribution is in line with the local financial affordability, whether financing will increase the hidden debt of the government, whether the project income is in line with reality, and whether the financing is self-balanced.
According to the regulations, the county-level government investment projects that should be audited by the provincial level shall be submitted to the municipal (state) government executive meeting for deliberation and forwarding by the county-level people's government. The deliberation stipulated in this paragraph refers to the municipal (state) people's government reviewing the rationality, feasibility and reliability of the project construction, and issuing clear review opinions.
Article 15 The department in charge of industry shall issue a separate industry review opinion on the evaluation and demonstration of government investment projects, and the main contents shall include whether the project conforms to the industry development plan and relevant policies and regulations, whether the project application materials are complete, and whether the project funding sources and channels are feasible.
Article 16 The sources of funds include municipal and county government investment projects that apply for local government bond funds. If the use of the financial budget funds at the corresponding level does not reach the specified amount or the use of the financial budget funds at the corresponding level but the total investment does not reach the specified amount, the government at the corresponding level shall make decision-making evaluation according to the regulations, and it is not necessary to report to the superior for review of the source of funds.
For municipal and county government investment projects that apply for issuing local government bonds, the development, reform and finance departments at the same level shall control the total amount of local government bonds declared by the projects. In principle, the total amount of annual bonds applied for by the project in the current year shall not exceed the amount of bonds allocated in the previous year, and it shall be clear how to implement the specific measures of project funding sources when local government bonds are not fully declared. If the source of funds is not clear, it shall not pass the examination.
Article 17? The contents of the evaluation report include: title and document number, table of contents, abstract, text and annexes. The evaluation institution shall notify the project unit in writing when it requests to supplement relevant information in the evaluation work. The written notice and supplementary materials shall be submitted to the development, reform and finance departments as annexes to the evaluation report.
Chapter four? Management of evaluation and demonstration institutions
Article 18? All levels and relevant departments in the province should choose engineering consulting units and government investment project evaluation institutions with corresponding professional (special) grade B and above credits as evaluation and demonstration institutions according to the prescribed procedures. Evaluation and demonstration institutions should put forward evaluation and demonstration opinions in accordance with the principles of professionalism, independence, objectivity and impartiality, so as to promote decision-making and evaluation to be more scientific, standardized and efficient.
Units and institutions blacklisted by the National Credit Information Sharing Platform (Guizhou) and Credit China (Guizhou) may not entrust them with decision-making and evaluation tasks.
Nineteenth evaluation institutions shall record through the online approval and supervision platform for investment projects. The appraisal institution shall conclude a written contract with the entrusting party to stipulate the rights and obligations of all parties and abide by them together.
Article 20? Evaluation and demonstration institutions participate in the evaluation and demonstration to implement paid services, and the service price shall be determined by both parties through consultation with reference to the relevant requirements and regulations of industry management, advocating high quality and good price, and prohibiting price monopoly and malicious low-price competition.
The appraisal institution and its staff shall not charge any fees to the project unit of the assessed matters, and shall not share the fees with the project unit.
Article 21? The preparation of the evaluation report should be based on relevant laws and regulations, development planning, technical standards, industrial policies, etc.
Chapter five? Evaluate the work norms of demonstration institutions
Article 22? After accepting the task of evaluation and demonstration, the evaluation and demonstration institution shall determine the person in charge of the project, set up an evaluation and demonstration team, formulate an evaluation and demonstration work plan, give timely feedback on the progress of evaluation and demonstration work, and submit an evaluation and demonstration report within the prescribed time limit.
The person in charge of the project should be a registered consulting engineer (investment). The personnel participating in the evaluation and demonstration team should be familiar with the relevant policies, regulations, plans and technical standards of the state and industry development, and the evaluation team should have more than two-thirds of the professional senior technical titles.
Article 23? The evaluation and demonstration of classified projects shall be conducted in accordance with the Law on Guarding State Secrets and its implementing regulations, and the development, reform and financial departments shall conduct confidentiality management by signing confidentiality agreements with evaluation and demonstration institutions and supervising their implementation.
Article 24? The evaluation report shall be accompanied by a list of project leaders and members of the evaluation team, and stamped with the official seal of the evaluation institution and the special seal for consulting engineer (investment) of the project leader.
Article 25? The time limit for development and reform, financial departments and industry authorities to entrust evaluation and demonstration is generally not more than 30 working days.
If it is really difficult for an assessment institution to complete the project within the prescribed time limit due to special circumstances, it shall report the relevant information in writing to the development and reform department and the financial department three working days before the expiration of the prescribed time limit. With the written consent of the entrusting unit, the completion period may be extended, but the extension period shall not exceed 45 working days.
Chapter VI Evaluation and Demonstration of Quality Management
Article 26? Evaluation and demonstration institutions shall establish and improve the quality management system and employment file system, optimize the evaluation workflow, improve the evaluation expert database, ensure the independence, impartiality, objectivity and science of the evaluation work, and be responsible for the authenticity, integrity, compliance and feasibility of the contents in the evaluation and demonstration report and evaluation and demonstration results.
Article 27? Development, reform and financial departments at all levels accept reports and complaints from evaluation and demonstration institutions, and organize or entrust relevant institutions and experts to carry out inspection and verification, and deal with the verified problems accordingly in accordance with the provisions.
After the completion of the evaluation and demonstration task, the entrusting unit shall evaluate the quality of the evaluation and demonstration report and explain the reasons for making the evaluation results. The evaluation of the appraisal report is divided into good, average and poor. The quality evaluation results are summarized by the municipal (state) development and reform departments before the end of each year 12 and reported to the provincial development and reform commission for the record, and linked to the evaluation and demonstration service fee.
Article 28? Evaluation and demonstration institutions in any of the following circumstances, the development and reform at all levels, the financial sector should be based on the situation of its public informed criticism, included in the "blacklist" and so on:
(a) there are major errors in the evaluation report, which are seriously inaccurate;
(2) Failing to complete the entrusted task within the prescribed time limit or the approved extension time limit.
Under any of the circumstances listed in item (1) above, relevant credit information shall be incorporated into the national credit information sharing platform according to law (Guizhou); If the circumstances are serious, it will be publicized to the public through the website of Credit China (Guizhou). The consulting engineer (investment) involved should be reported to the National Development and Reform Commission, and it is suggested to cancel his practice registration.
Article 29? The relevant staff of the departments in charge of development and reform, finance and industry, who neglect their duties, abuse their powers, engage in malpractices for selfish ends and ask for bribes in the process of evaluation and demonstration management, shall be punished according to law for the responsible leaders and persons directly responsible; If a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law.
Chapter VII Supplementary Provisions
Article 30? Development and reform, the financial sector in accordance with the annual assessment and demonstration tasks entrusted by the previous year, put forward the demand for funds, included in the preliminary work budget for the next year and issued an arrangement plan.
Article 31? The Guizhou Provincial Development and Reform Commission and the Guizhou Provincial Department of Finance shall be responsible for the interpretation of these rules.
Article 32? These Rules shall come into force as of the date of promulgation.
For more information about project/service/procurement bidding, and to improve the winning rate, please click on the bottom of official website Customer Service for free consultation:/#/? source=bdzd