As the saying goes, investment is risky and you need to be cautious when entering the industry. During the Porsche round at the beginning of the year, many people lost all their warehouses.

It is precisely because of this that many people have filed lawsuits against Bank of China's Crude Oil Treasure project, believing that such losses should not be borne by themselves. Even after the principal is paid off, they still need to bear additional compensation.

At present, this case has been decided by the court. Here, I would like to share with you the latest judgment results.

Bank of China will bear the losses caused this time.

After a year of investigation and sorting out in China, the court determined that Bank of China should bear the main responsibility for this incident. Therefore, for those customers who were short-term, the losses they caused should be borne by AVIC, and these companies should not be allowed to bear the responsibility.

Customers bear losses in addition to principal, because the Crude Oil Treasure project is originally a 100% margin trading model.

It is not a simple futures model, so if the position is liquidated, these investors who have previously bought the crude oil treasure project will not be able to bear the responsibility.

What are the highlights of this adjustment?

In fact, the biggest highlight of this adjustment is that the court safeguarded the rights and interests of most investors, because the Bank of China had not made a final conclusion on compensation before, believing that these investment mistakes should be responsible for its own investment failures.

However, during the subsequent investigation, the interviewer discovered that the investment project itself had some design flaws and that there was a serious problem in the management of the clock industry, which led to this loss.

How do you view this incident?

As the saying goes, investment is risky, and you need to be cautious when entering the industry. Since investment must take a lot of risks, and the crude oil treasure you buy itself is a project with a large profit margin, the risk must be greater, so in such a situation

Under such circumstances, the loss of principal was already foreseeable, but to be honest, in addition to the principal, I would also have to pay some money to the bank, which I never expected, so such an unreasonable request was rejected by everyone.

Court's rejection.