To study the possibility of fund quilt cover, we should first study the industry sector where the fund has a heavy position. The heavy position of Nuoan is mainly in the semiconductor sector, and the semiconductor and electronic components sector is analyzed. The current position is higher than the high point in 215, but the net value of Nuoan's growth is actually significantly lower than the highest point in 215. This shows that Nuoan's fund is covered with semiconductors but has not outperformed the relevant index. As an active management fund, it has really done poorly and has been trapped by Nuoan.

Let's analyze several schemes for your reference:

The first scheme: the motionless solution method. It is to let Noah grow up, change space with time, and wait for the market to solve the problem. The risk of this solution is time risk. If we follow the way of the wave of technology bull market in 215, it will take 22 to get the solution at the highest point in 215, that is, it will take five years in the middle, so how many years will Nuoan have to wait in the future? Maybe the time is short, maybe it will take a long time, which is really difficult to determine.

the second scheme: increasing positions and pulling low-cost unwinding method. If this method follows the most extreme method, it will fall back to where it grew in 215, that is, it will fall back to .61 yuan from the net value of 2.24 yuan. Of course, this is the most extreme assumption. If it rises again, it will take time to unwind. From 2.24 yuan to .61 yuan, it is equivalent to being lower than that of 1.6 yuan. Assuming that the positions will be added eight times, That is to say, you need to add positions once every time you fall in .2 yuan. The premise of this solution method is that you have enough funds, and the biggest risk is that all the funds are spent in it. But now many people are already in heavy positions, so the feasibility of using this method is relatively small.

the third scheme: abandon Nuoan decisively, choose an active hybrid fund managed by an excellent fund manager, and hold it for a long time until the loss is earned back. For example, Nuoan has lost 1, yuan, so the new fund must wait until it earns more than 1, yuan to consider lightening its position, which is the real solution.

finally, to sum up: how to untie Noah's quilt? Nothing more than these three methods, the first is the motionless method, the second is the cost method of adding positions and lowering costs, and the third is to convert excellent funds to wait for income to offset the loss of Nuoan's growth. Which of the above three schemes is the best? In fact, everyone's views are different, but we must understand that the essence of financial transactions is probabilistic transactions. We try our best to choose high probability events, and I believe everyone should have their own choices now.