There won't be any problem.

Taxes and fees related to area in second-hand housing transactions are generally transaction fees.

This tax is calculated based on the area on the property certificate and has nothing to do with the actual usable area of ??the house.

The area on the real estate certificate is smaller than the actual usable area. It usually exists in duplex residences or villa-type residences. Sometimes, this may also happen when some ordinary residential developers provide additional area.

Since most "second-hand houses" have become personal consumption goods with the commercialization of housing, their "identity" is relatively complicated, and it is very important to understand their property rights.

Special attention should be paid to the fact that no matter how good the house is, do not buy it, even if it is a house with disputed property rights or a house with partial property rights (such as a public housing purchased at a standard price), a house with full property rights, unclear property rights, or no property rights.

Can't get the property ownership certificate.

Extended information: In September this year, Ms. He bought this second-hand house located in the Family Courtyard of the Information Engineering School on Caozhou Road in Heze City for 290,000 yuan through a housing agency.

Soon, Ms. He from the Mudan District Housing Management Bureau of Heze City went through the transfer procedures. The real estate certificate showed that the address of the house was Room 2, Building 3, of this family courtyard. The construction area was 74.91 square meters. The house was built in 1998.

But not long after moving in, Ms. He discovered a small problem when paying the gas and water bills. The payment address was Room 2, Building 2, and Building 3 became Building 2. What happened?

?

Ms. He immediately found a housing agency.

The agent said that maybe the property owner had marked the wrong building number.

This explanation did not dispel Ms. He's doubts, and she then went to the Mudan District Housing Authority to make inquiries.

This inquiry was like a "bolt from the blue" to Ms. He.

The property rights of Room 2 in Building 3 actually have two "owners", one is Ms. He, and the other is a person named Dong.

In Room 2, Building 2, where Ms. He currently lives, the "Head of Household" item in the housing information is blank. This unexpected discovery really shocked the couple. Could they have been deceived?

The house corresponding to Ms. He's real estate certificate is located on the south side of the house where she actually lives, with a different building number and different unit.

After discovering that the property rights information of the house did not match the house she lived in, Ms. He asked the Mudan District Real Estate Surveying and Mapping Brigade to issue a stratified household plan for Room 2 in Building 2.

But what this floor plan shows is: the house was built in 1993, with an area of ??only 60.93 square meters. Compared with the information on the real estate certificate, not only is the area smaller by nearly 14 square meters, but the house is also 5 years older.

The house I bought with all my savings was inexplicably missing 14 square meters. No one would be able to accept this. So, is there an error in the information on the real estate certificate?

Or did Ms. He buy the wrong house?

What is the problem with these 14 square meters that disappeared?

On December 14, the reporter and Ms. He came to the Housing Management Bureau of Mudan District, Heze City.

After explaining the purpose of the visit, the staff of the Housing Authority retrieved all information about the property rights of Ms. He’s house.

The reporter found that this house was a converted house, and the original owner was Zhang. In 2013, Zhang sold the house to Ms. He’s previous landlord, Mr. Wang.

Staff from the Housing Authority explained that during the transfer procedures, Zhang provided incorrect housing information, which resulted in an error in the real estate certificate.

Although the owners provided wrong information, didn't the Housing Authority conduct verification when handling the transfer for them?

The explanation given by this staff member was: This building had been surveyed and mapped in 2012, which means that this information already exists on the computer.

When Wang came to apply, he applied for Building No. 3, so when the Housing Authority submitted the drawings, there was no need to go to the site. The data was already there and there was no need to collect the data.

It turned out that it was for this reason that the house Ms. He bought was inexplicably missing 14 square meters.

After overpaying for 14 square meters of house, plus five years of damage to the house, Ms. He felt very much at a loss. But now, the house cannot be replaced. Ms. He just wants to modify the house information and recover her losses.

.

So, who should bear the responsibility in this matter?

What is the attitude of all parties involved?

The Housing Authority said it would revise the housing information, but did not respond as to who should bear the responsibility.

The staff of the housing agency said that if there is a problem with the housing information, all they can do is actively coordinate with the original owner.

The previous homeowner, Mr. Wang, also said that he would not bear the 60,000 yuan compensation proposed by Ms. He. He was only willing to refund three to five thousand yuan, and nothing more.

So, who should bear the loss of Ms. He?

Who among these parties has the greatest responsibility?

Some lawyers believe that the Mudan District Housing Authority obviously committed serious dereliction of duty.