A little boy with frost blew up the net the other day. It is very cold in winter, but he only wears clothes, his hands are frozen, his face is flushed with cold, and his black hair is dyed white by frost, which really makes people feel distressed.

Fortunately, there is great love in society and donations have to be made one after another. The Zhaotong Youth Foundation, where the little boy is located, launched the "Youth Warm Winter Activity" to raise money for similar poor families in the county.

However, after the fundraising, it angered many netizens in the process of distribution, as follows:

First, why should the money donated by netizens to help "Ice Flower Teenager" be used to help others, instead of giving it all to "Ice Flower Teenager"? I specially read the fund-raising instructions of the foundation. The explanation is not specifically aimed at "ice flower teenagers". If it is specially given to him, it needs to be specially noted, so it can be said that not all the money was donated to the little boy.

Can that netizen launch a fund-raising activity of his own to help the little boy? This is not feasible in law, because the law stipulates that individuals cannot raise funds for non-immediate relatives, so it is not feasible to let netizens send money to raise funds for the little boy.

In fact, this is a misunderstanding caused by the Internet. The netizen is very caring and wants to raise money to help him, but he can't. So the foundation launched a fund-raising, but the fund-raising of the foundation was not specifically aimed at the little boy. It was just initiated with the help of this incident, which made netizens think that the fund-raising of the foundation was specially for supporting the little boy. In the end, it was found that it was not, saying that the foundation disposed of the funds at will. I think we should always be clear about the reasons and not take it for granted.

Another aspect of netizens' anger is the whereabouts of funds. These are some problems I saw on Weibo, but I also have different opinions.

Netizens said why the government should take money to buy things. Can the government believe in buying things? Can you believe the whereabouts of the funds announced by the government?

I think these actions only need the government to operate. Otherwise, who is capable and rational? Being regarded as poverty alleviation funds is just a feeling, a name. These should all require the government to come forward to reassure the recipients.

There is also a comment in Weibo that the government will raise the price and then take the difference from it, so the whereabouts of the funds announced by the government are not credible.

I think it is indeed possible to raise the quotation, but we can't let the government operate just because it will raise the quotation, and we can't help but believe in the whereabouts of the announcement. I remember that in a simple fund, it was mentioned that I would buy more than 800 heaters to warm my classmates.

I think some people may do this, but we also have to ask, what is the unit price of these heaters? How much is the freight? What is the unit price of warm clothes for children? How much is the freight? What items need to be spent in the process of delivering these items? How much did it cost?

We can't stop the most competent and reasonable execution because of doubt, nor can we refuse to believe this and that because of doubt. On the contrary, we should take these published contents, analyze, ask questions and explore with our own questioning spirit. These are the right methods.