The first is to clarify the scope of performance evaluation.

The scope of performance evaluation covers all project expenditures of general public budget, government fund budget and state-owned capital operation budget. Performance evaluation involving government investment funds, government and social capital cooperation (PPP), government purchase of services and other budget funds and related management activities can be implemented with reference to these measures.

The second is to improve the performance evaluation system.

Performance evaluation is divided into three ways: unit self-evaluation, department evaluation and financial evaluation. The unit self-evaluation should be independently implemented by the project unit, that is, "whoever spends will evaluate".

Department evaluation should be conducted on the basis of unit self-evaluation, giving priority to major reform and development projects that the department performs its duties, randomly selecting general projects, aiming at implementing the main responsibility and improving the performance concept, and connecting the requirements with the performance target declaration to achieve comprehensive coverage.

Financial evaluation gives priority to the project organizations with wide coverage, great influence, high social concern, long implementation period, complex input-output relationship and various forms of effect presentation to carry out performance evaluation.

The third is to improve the scientificity of performance evaluation.

The Measures uniformly set the weight of the first-level indicators of unit self-assessment. The weight of output and benefit indicators shall not be less than 60% in principle. It is required that the department and financial evaluation index should be closely related to the evaluation object, and fully reflect the project decision-making, project and fund management, output and benefit.

The fourth is to clarify the responsibilities of all parties in performance evaluation.

The financial department is responsible for formulating the performance evaluation system and guiding the municipal budget department and the lower financial department to carry out performance evaluation; Arrange budget departments and units to carry out self-evaluation work, conduct spot checks on self-evaluation results, and urge budget departments and units to make full use of self-evaluation and evaluation results; According to the need to organize the implementation of financial evaluation, strengthen the feedback and application of evaluation results.

Fifth, the application of evaluation results has been strengthened.

The "Measures" stipulate that the results of performance evaluation should be substantially linked with budget arrangement, policy adjustment and management improvement. In principle, if the evaluation grade is excellent or good, support will be given according to the situation; If the assessment level is medium or poor, it is necessary to improve policies and management and reduce the budget according to the situation.