To compare the influence, the landlord should at least give specific comparison criteria in several aspects, such as the most basic popularity, representing the classic, artistic and commercial nature of the work, and the deeper influence on the film industry and even popular culture. Without these standards, the so-called "Who has great influence in China" can only be a false proposition, and the respondents are all impressionistic.

This depends on what angle you look at it. Personally, if we say that social influence is Jackie Chan, after all, in a harmonious society, only he is put on the table more; If we talk about his works, it is Chow Yun Fat. Jackie Chan and Jet Li's works and images are relatively simple, so if their styles are combined, they are unique. Although Stephen Chow's works are the first to be meaningless, they are also suspected of being of a single type. Andy Lau's professionalism is an example for everyone, but the image of his classic works needs to be strengthened. Bruce Lee gave us an era of drifting away, and he was endowed with more significance of the times. On the other hand, the images of Chow Yun Fat's works are changeable, and the characterization is unforgettable. Both the early funny villain and the later series of gamblers and prisons have aroused the upsurge of this type of film, and the works have greater influence! But anyway, your proposition is really confusing. I think most of us like these. Except Bruce Lee's works, other people's works should be accompanied by the growth of our generation!