1) The new fund is cheaper. The subscription rate of new funds is usually relatively low. The subscription rate of new funds is generally 1%- 1.2%, while the subscription rate of old funds is 1.5% (for example, the third-party fund agency website. Com has a preferential price, generally 60% off).

2) The new fund lacks historical reference data. If the fund manager of a fund company is also a newcomer, we can't understand its investment strategy, let alone judge its investment ability; For the old fund, because it has been in operation for a period of time, it has a relatively high transparency and can learn more about its previous investment performance, so there are sufficient data for reference.

3) The new fund has an opening period. When new fund funds are put into the market, there must be a opening period, which is longer, usually 1-6 months.

Of course, whether it is an old fund or a new fund, for investors, in the final analysis, it depends on their ultimate investment ability. In the medium and long term, new and old funds are not the key factors affecting investors' returns. Sustained outstanding performance is the embodiment of a fund manager's comprehensive strength. The immediate advantage is temporary. Whether it is a new fund or an old fund, only by choosing a good fund can we get good returns. For more information (Puhua Business School), please adopt it.