On March 8th, Sun Wei, a representative of the 13th National People's Congress, talked about delaying retirement, and suggested that a flexible retirement mechanism on a larger scale could be implemented: for example, the current standard age is 6, with fluctuation of 15 years. This means that we should allow people to choose early retirement at 45. And she thinks that this can give full play to the security function of social security; Provide a new way to relieve the pressure of providing for the aged; Helps to alleviate the decline in birth rate; Can restore family function; It provides new possibilities for individuals to participate in society better and longer. So, can this proposal really reduce late marriage and late childbirth?

In my opinion, it is impossible to fundamentally solve the problem of late marriage and late childbearing. Here are some of my personal thoughts.

first, the composition of the crowd is different? The base is small

On December 11th, 221, Ning Ji Zhe said at the 221-222 China Economic Annual Conference hosted by China Center for International Economic Exchanges that less than 7 million of the more than 7 million employed people in China were employed in the system, including about 4 million state-owned enterprises still in operation and about 4 million government civil servants and institutions.

the number of civil servants in China is around 9 million, and the number of public institutions is around 3 million, so the two add up to 4 million. The number of people working in the system accounts for 15%-2% of the total employment. It is true that this group of people can vacate some jobs for young people when they retire at the age of 45, but the base of this group of people is small, and it is simply a drop in the bucket to shake the idea of late marriage and late childbirth. And you have to ensure that these people can actively cooperate with fertility.

The population outside the system has a large base, which is an important role in the national employment ratio. This part is the real population that needs to solve the problem of late marriage and late childbirth.

Second, new social problems will arise

As we all know, the work of the staff in the system is relatively stable, and the salary will not fluctuate too much. As long as there are no problems in principle within the scope of work, they can basically land smoothly. There is no worries after retirement, and the pension is enough for them to eat and drink for the rest of their lives. However, it is unrealistic for staff in private enterprises like us not to say that they will only work in one company all their lives. At the same time, private enterprise personnel will often encounter special circumstances such as company closure, and retire at the age of 45, especially the female surnames of this age. Relying on that scarce retirement salary, they not only have to take care of family expenses, but also bear the diseases that constantly appear on themselves. This is undoubtedly adding insult to injury to the heavy life.

Third, the employment pressure has not changed

As we all know, it is still because of the fierce competition and lack of jobs in society that people get married late and have children late. Wages and salaries can't keep up with the surrounding prices, housing prices and a series of consumption steps, then the most direct problem will affect the fertility of young people. How can you have children without money? This is a very realistic problem.

I am a woman myself, and I often receive a lot of resistance in the process of finding a job. Problems such as low wages and no insurance accumulation fund are endless. It's really not advisable to have children under these pressures. Who doesn't want to give children a stable living environment?

Fourth, young people's worries

Even if people who retire early make room, the young people who take up their posts will be fiercely competitive. Which company is willing to have employees who have just given birth to their children and have children on maternity leave not long after, many young people don't want to have children, but dare not. Is the position still there after giving birth? Which kindergarten does the child go to? Go to that school? That one doesn't need a strong economic guarantee. You can give your children a good house, a good education and a good one. Do you have enough time to spend with your children and give them enough love?

so to sum up. As a woman, I don't think that early retirement will give me the idea of having two children and three children. I think more about whether my salary can provide more educational resources for my children, whether I can allocate a good school district for my children, and whether I can let my children have a childhood without worrying about material foundation.