1. First, we log in to the system of National Natural Science Foundation of China (the website is congested today, so we can try several times), and click "Project Search" in the upper right corner to enter the project search interface.
2. In the project retrieval interface, we don't need to retrieve the project, but query the personnel's project information, so we also need to click "Information query of personnel-funded projects" on the right to query the personnel's project situation.
After entering the information query interface of personnel-funded projects, you can see that the keyword attributes provided for retrieval are name, company code and company name, in which name is required.
3. Enter the name and company name, and then click the query below.
The above is the way to inquire about the participation of NSFC.
Extended data:
The national fund mainly supports basic research with important scientific significance or important application prospects; Applications, development and new product projects are not supported.
I. Evaluation System of National Natural Science Fund
1, scientific significance or application prospect: (focus on evaluating the research value of the project)
2. Innovation of academic thought.
3. Research content of the project: (whether the research content is appropriate, whether the research focus is prominent, and whether the selected key issues are accurate)
4. Overall research plan: (whether the overall research plan is reasonable, targeted and feasible, and whether the technical methods are innovative)
5. Research ability of the project team: (research ability, work basis, personnel composition and experimental conditions of the project host and main personnel)
Each item has four grades: a, b, c and d.
Comprehensive evaluation: A. Excellent B. Good C. Moderate D. Poor.
Funding suggestion: A. Priority funding B. Grantable C. No funding
Excellent: innovative, with important scientific significance or application prospects, appropriate research content and reasonable research scheme;
Good: the concept is novel, which has important scientific significance or application prospect, and the research content and scheme are good;
English: it has certain scientific research value or application prospect, and the research content and overall research plan are acceptable, but it needs to be revised;
Poor: There are obvious deficiencies in some key aspects.
Second, about the topic selection
1. Accurate topic selection is the key to the success of the fund: we must find the starting point and direction-the key points in the research guide and the scope of encouraging funding should be clearly studied.
2. Topic selection should be problem-oriented, not technology-oriented.
3. The starting point should be accurate, not too wide or too big, as long as there is innovation and research value.
4. The topic should be combined with your own research foundation and accumulation;
5. Choose the topic as early as possible in order to collect enough information.
The project name should be novel, accurate and eye-catching. Topics can include research objects, research methods and specific problems to be solved. You can choose relatively novel nouns that others have never heard of.
Third, about abstraction.
Abstract is the first part seen by the experts, but it must be written at the end. Avoid ambiguity. Briefly explain the importance of the project, research methods to be adopted, key scientific problems to be solved, expected results, academic significance, etc. Determine your tone. Don't be "top-heavy", that is, there are too many general descriptions related to the theme and not enough explanations for what you are studying.
Iv. Basis of the project (the significance of the project research should come straight to the point, and don't say too much about it but not directly related).
Writing points:
1. Analyze the research status and progress at home and abroad, point out the key problems that need to be solved, and put forward the urgency of solving the problems.
Sex; Don't deliberately avoid articles by domestic experts;
2. The current situation in China must include my research progress, emphasize the research foundation, write clearly the applicant's ideas, and write clearly your opinions.
Special ideas about scientific problems, etc.
3. It is necessary to clarify the sufficient reasons and theoretical and academic significance of the research;
4. Filling the domestic blank is not the basis of project establishment: filling the blank is the follow-up study! The fund supports innovation.
5. Main references: References should be weighty, and there should be no citation errors! Pay attention to the limitation, there must be the latest literature of 1-2 years! Too little literature makes people feel that you don't know enough about research trends; Too many irrelevant documents can easily make people think that you are making up numbers! More importantly, you must quote your own published references.
Precautions:
1, the basis of the argument should not be too popular, and the key issues should be explained clearly.
2, the style of writing is argumentative, there can be no emotional language, there can be no extreme language, we can not deliberately belittle other people's works, especially domestic counterparts do not need to keep up with the situation.
Verb (abbreviation of verb) project research content
1. research objective: to solve the problem of scientific and academic style. The research goal is to study and solve academic problems in specific events. Therefore, to avoid setting too large a goal, it is not advisable to have too many words.
2. Research content: focused. Moreover, the fund only requires solving one or two scientific problems, and it is the most taboo to do everything. All research contents should have subheadings. If there are too many contents, you can refine the contents. In order to avoid "too much content, the focus is not prominent." But the research method must not be written in the research content.
The main problems in the research content:
1, can't tell the difference between research content and research method, but take research method as the research content; The judging experts will think that the thinking is not clear.
2. There are too many contents and the key points are not prominent: the contents are complex or vague and have little to do with the research objectives;
3. There is no internal logic between the research contents.
4. The key problem you solved: refers to the research difficulties involved in the project. If the key questions are not clearly written or not correct at all, the judging experts will think that your thinking is not clear and will not agree to the funding. Words should not be too many.
4. Expert review group or professional committee review (second instance) 5. Review the funded projects determined in the second instance. 6. Review by the Board of Directors of the Fund Committee. 7. Issue a notice of approval or disapproval.