Division of responsibilities for traffic jams:

1. If a traffic jam is hit by a straight line, the traffic jam will generally bear the full responsibility or main responsibility for the accident. If there is no fault in the following vehicle, the traffic jam will bear the full responsibility;

2. If the jammed vehicle has evidence to prove that the rear vehicle collided intentionally, the main or full responsibility for the accident shall be borne by the rear vehicle, and the jammed vehicle shall bear secondary responsibility or no responsibility;

3. If the traffic in front is forced to change lanes and the traffic jam is not completely successful, for example, only the front of the car is pressed to the solid line, and the bottom of the car is still in other lanes, then the time of rear-end collision is the responsibility of the front car;

4. If the front vehicle jammed through the dotted line (the dotted line is allowed to change lanes) and quickly completed this action, but the rear vehicle rear-ended the front vehicle, then this time is the responsibility of the rear vehicle.

The division of responsibilities for traffic jams is expanded:

1. Rubbing of traffic jams: cars are prone to traffic jams at traffic lights, and if traffic jams cause rear-end collisions, it is definitely the full responsibility of traffic jams;

2. The rear car overtakes from the right and rear-ends: If the rear car overtakes from the right and rear-ends, it is the responsibility of the rear car. Because according to the provisions of China's road traffic safety law, it is forbidden to overtake from the right, and overtaking from the right is illegal;

3. Line pressing for rear-end collision: If the line is compacted and rear-end collision is caused, the line pressing vehicle will take full responsibility in any case.

to sum up, if the traffic jam vehicle is rubbed, the responsibility for the accident shall be determined by the traffic management department of the public security organ according to the role played by the behavior of the parties in the road traffic accident and the severity of the fault. The jammed vehicle itself is at fault. If it is caused by the congestion, the jammed vehicle will bear the responsibility by itself.

Legal basis:

Article 74 of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China

In case of a dispute over compensation for traffic accidents, the parties concerned may request the traffic management department of the public security organ for mediation, or they may directly bring a civil lawsuit to the people's court.

after mediation by the traffic administrative department of the public security organ, if the parties fail to reach an agreement or fail to perform the mediation after it takes effect, the parties may bring a civil lawsuit to the people's court.

Article 75

Medical institutions shall promptly rescue the injured in traffic accidents, and shall not delay the treatment because the rescue expenses are not paid in time. If the vehicle involved in the accident participates in compulsory third-party liability insurance for motor vehicles, the insurance company shall pay the rescue expenses within the limit of liability; If the rescue expenses exceed the limit of liability, and they do not participate in compulsory motor vehicle third-party liability insurance or escape after the accident, the social assistance fund for road traffic accidents shall advance part or all of the rescue expenses in advance, and the social assistance fund management institution for road traffic accidents shall have the right to recover from the person responsible for the traffic accident.

Article 76

If a motor vehicle accident causes personal injury or property loss, the insurance company shall compensate it within the liability limit of compulsory motor vehicle third party liability insurance; The insufficient part shall be liable for compensation in accordance with the following provisions:

(1) In case of a traffic accident between motor vehicles, the party at fault shall be liable for compensation; If both parties are at fault, they shall share the responsibility in proportion to their respective faults.

(2) If a traffic accident occurs between a motor vehicle and a non-motor vehicle driver or pedestrian, and the non-motor vehicle driver or pedestrian is not at fault, the motor vehicle party shall be liable for compensation; If there is evidence that non-motor vehicle drivers and pedestrians are at fault, the liability for compensation of the motor vehicle party shall be appropriately reduced according to the degree of fault; If the motor vehicle party is not at fault, it shall bear no more than 1% of the liability for compensation.

The loss of traffic accidents is caused by non-motor vehicle drivers and pedestrians intentionally colliding with motor vehicles, and the motor vehicle party shall not be liable for compensation.