The Beijing Municipal Civil Affairs Bureau received a real name report from Sima Shan Zhi, reporting the opaque use of donations by the Han Hong Charity Foundation. After receiving the report, the Civil Affairs Bureau attached great importance to it and instructed relevant departments to investigate.
Han Hong, who was working hard for public welfare in Wuhan at that time, ignored this matter and still fought in the front line. As the saying goes, the pure are self-clean, and justice is at home. Although this Sima Sanji listed many problems, netizens and most just people in the society still supported Han Hong, and condemned and criticized Sima Sanji's behavior as a poor performance of rubbing heat. Sima Sanji didn't go back, but Mr. Ma stood up and immediately reported Sima Sanji to the Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau.
After seven days of investigation, the Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau finally gave the results of the investigation on the Han Hong Foundation. Lawyer Ma Yanming also forwarded the investigation results of the Civil Affairs Bureau at 1 1 last night. In the report of the survey results, three important messages were mainly released. First, the total amount of donations raised by the Han Hong Foundation since its establishment is 53 1 10,000 yuan; Second, the details of the use of these donations, of which only 25 investments were not announced in time as required; Third, the Han Hong Foundation has achieved a relatively standardized operation and has not found any undisclosed charitable projects!
In the last paragraph of the circular, the Civil Affairs Bureau fully affirmed the work done by the Han Hong Foundation in fighting the epidemic, but also found that some investment items were not made public in time, and there was public fundraising before obtaining the qualification for public fundraising, requiring the Han Hong Foundation to make corrections within a time limit.
Although the Han Hong Foundation was officially required to make corrections within a time limit, on the whole, it was affirmed that the operation of the Han Hong Foundation was relatively standardized, and there may be doubts about the investment of the Foundation. Can the donations raised be used for investment? Actually, this is no problem. It's clearly stipulated in the law.
At the beginning of 20 13, the legislative affairs office of Beijing municipal government solicited opinions from the society on the first "Beijing charity promotion measures (draft)". It is clearly stated in the Measures that foundations are encouraged to raise funds and operate funds in accordance with regulations to maintain and increase the value of funds. It can be seen that the official attitude is still very supportive. As for the investable proportion, is there any provision in the Regulations on the Administration of Foundations? Every year, Public Offering of Fund is used to engage in public welfare undertakings stipulated in the articles of association, and shall not be less than 70% of the total income of the previous year; A non-public offering fund shall use not less than 8% of the fund balance of the previous year for public welfare undertakings as stipulated in the articles of association? . In other words, except the expenses that must be used for public welfare (70% for public offering and 8% for non-public offering) and administrative office expenses, the remaining assets can be used for investment. However, the Regulations on the Administration of Foundations are also clear? If the board of directors of the foundation makes improper decisions in violation of these regulations and articles of association, resulting in property losses of the foundation, the directors involved in the decision-making shall be liable for compensation. ? Therefore, the investment behavior of the foundation is not to make money with other people's money, without any constraints, and the investment failure is also liable for compensation!
According to the Regulations on the Management of Foundations and the survey results given by the Beijing Municipal Civil Affairs Bureau, the operation of foundations in Han Hong is completely without problems, the use of donations is reasonable, all the announced funds have been announced, and the investment is to preserve and increase the value of donations. The only minor flaw is that 25 investments have not been announced in time.
At present, the official has given a clear investigation result, and the flow of Sima 3 bogey is also damn. The Han Hong Foundation is as active as the Han Hong Foundation. I hope Sima Liu Zhi will stop maliciously slandering Han Hong who does public welfare, otherwise it will chill the hearts of more people who do public welfare!