Trademark Review and Adjudication Board reviewers should refer to similar trademark reexamination cases, rather than just treating them as individual cases, in order to improve the quality and level of trademark review and avoid the manpower, material resources, and time caused by submitting reexaminations after trademark rejections. social consumption in other aspects and improve social and economic benefits.

For example, the Class 32 Sanya Tianya 9109828 trademark is similar to the Class 32 Tianya Quan 32415932, and was successfully registered after rejection, which shows that the Class 32 trademark Tianya and Sanya Tianya are not similar, and the Class 32 Tianya Premium 20216150 is similar to Tianya Quan. , Sanya Tianya are similar, and the core part was passed after rejection and review, which shows that Tianya Youpin is not similar in meaning to Tianya Spring and Sanya Tianya. Therefore, when reviewing the trademarks of Class 29 Tianya, reviewers should take into account the cases where Tianya Youpin and Tianya are not similar, and consider granting approval conditions for Class 29 Tianya 21406337 and Tianya Youpin 20310224, instead of just treating them as individual cases. To determine whether Tianya Premium is similar to Tianya, the opinions of the review experts and the reviewers should be consistent. Also, if Category 32 Tianya Premium is passed, then the review basis for Category 32 Tianya Quan 25158202 should be universal, because according to the review cases, Tianya Spring is not similar to Tianya Premium and Sanya Tianya. I hope the reviewers can consider it objectively. Adopt the opinions of review experts.

For questions about trademark review, please call the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (010-63219181).

Bajie Trademark Network provides trademark transfer services, purchasing trademarks saves trademark registration time