?Recently, Chanel sued Huawei because Huawei’s trademark is similar to Chanel’s trademark. However, the court ruled that Huawei's trademark was not similar to Chanel's trademark and rejected Chanel's appeal, which attracted the attention of many netizens.

In the picture, the left side is Huawei’s registered trademark, and the right side is Chanel’s trademark. From the picture, we can see that there is no similarity between the two trademarks. As for Chanel’s claim of plagiarism, it is even more groundless.

As a French luxury brand, Chanel has a high reputation around the world and has many loyal users and fans. Chanel’s position in luxury brands cannot be underestimated. The reason why Chanel sued Huawei this time also attracted attention.

?In fact, looking at the trademarks of some brands around the world, it is not difficult to see that the elements used in the trademarks of some brands are similar, and they are very different in style and pattern. Therefore, if It is wrong to judge plagiarism just because the graphics are similar. There is still a big difference between the trademarks of Huawei and Chanel.

First of all, Huawei's "double C" opening is oriented up and down, while Chanel's "double C" opening is oriented left and right. Secondly, the thickness of the lines of the two trademarks is different. Huawei uses very thin lines, while Chanel uses very thick lines, and there is their brand name underneath, which is very different from Huawei's trademark.

? There is no basis for Chanel's behavior. No matter how many times they appeal in court, they will not succeed, because it can be seen that there are obvious differences between Huawei's trademark and Chanel's trademark. Therefore, Chanel is not going to succeed with the trademark thing. Moreover, Chanel's approach will also create free advertising for Huawei. Make Huawei more accessible to the world.