Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark inquiry - What's the difference between branded cross stitch and miscellaneous brand?
What's the difference between branded cross stitch and miscellaneous brand?
At present, DMC has the best reputation in the cross-stitch market!

French DMC (all imported): it is generally recognized as a good brand. Many cross-stitch company's embroidery drawings are based on DMC thread number. DMC thread is soft, full and shiny, with positive color, lint-free, colorfast and unbreakable. The color of the finished product is the same as that of the renderings, but the disadvantage is that the price is relatively expensive, and there are few varieties of kits, which are usually wired by the drawings themselves, but the selection range of drawings is very large. MM with capital can choose this, but the fake line is rampant in the market, and many buyers are easily deceived.

Germany ANC (all imported): the color is brighter than DMC, which is suitable for embroidered grass and other drawings. Generally, the wiring is also according to the drawings, and there are not many kits, and the price is similar to DMC, which belongs to the more expensive kind.

Mona Lisa (all imported): Korean cloth and Thai Venus thread are soft, full and shiny, with positive color, no hair, no knot, no fading and no breakage. There seem to be two kinds of Mona Lisa's kits, the one with good quality, and the thread is twisted into a twist shape, which is not faded and shiny; The poor quality kind, the thread is scattered, the gloss is also good, but it is thin, easy to break, and will be fuzz. It is said that it uses domestic thread instead of imported thread, so you must pay attention when buying MMS.

Yimei (all imported): Korean cloth, Thai Venus thread, the cloth is square, the thread is soft, full and shiny, the color is positive, it is not knotted and does not fade. It is an imported product with DMC, but the price is too different. I myself, including people around me, will choose this brand first, and the finished product effect is absolutely first-class. The advantage is that it is specially designed for embroidery thread of kits, and there are no fakes in the market to buy with confidence, and there is no quality problem.

European royal family (all imported): The newly-developed brand actually belongs to the same company as Mona Lisa. Overall, the quality is not bad.

KS (Japanese technology, made in China): the thread quality is slightly hard, the luster is slightly inferior to that of imported goods, it is lint-free, does not fade, and some colors are easily broken. There is a little color difference between the finished product and the renderings. Many merchants say that KS is all imported, in fact, KS is made in China. The line is good, but the price of domestic line is really high. Moreover, lying about the import line is suspected of deceiving consumers.

Yedan (all imported): made in South Korea, the luster of the thread is acceptable, it is not knotted and does not fade. The disadvantage is that it is a little thin, and the price is on the high side.

Zhenai (made in China): Yes, Zhenai is indeed a domestic thread, and it is actually the same as Jin Xin. The manufacturer is in Yiwu, but the quality of Zhenai is better than that of Jin Xin Palace. The drawings and cloth are all right, generally reflecting that the quality of the thread is slightly poor, uneven in thickness and prone to fuzzing, but now it seems to have improved.

Gongting and Jin Xin (made in China): The advantage is that the price is cheap, and the quality is still incomparable with imported ones. The gloss of the thread is poor, and it is easy to break and fluff, and some of them will fade, and there will be insufficient thread quantity. Sometimes the renderings and drawings will be biased. It is suitable for MM who just learned embroidery to practice hands, and it is best not to choose this kind as a gift or decoration. The quality of the palace is better than that of Jin Xin, and since 26, the palace has registered a trademark, which is the palace "court" rather than the palace "court".