The Green Pepper Case was selected into the Supreme People's Court report. This case can become a typical case. In my personal opinion, there are two reasons. First, it is a case of rights protection that should be stopped and cracked down on. Second, this case shows that the judiciary is fair and impartial and maintains a good culture of rights protection.

Similar to the "Green Pepper Case", there were many last year, such as the famous "Xiaoyao Town Hu Spicy Soup", "Tongguan Roujiamo" and so on. These rights protection cases did not receive support from netizens, but instead aroused public opinion and accusations from netizens.

Fortunately, these rights protection cases were eventually stopped. Even if they went to court, they did not succeed in defending their rights. During the Two Sessions, it was also selected into the Supreme People's Court report. Such news is exciting, and it also makes Qinghuajiao catering operators feel relieved. 1. The case is rather special and belongs to the category of rights protection. Green peppercorns are widely used in life as a catering ingredient. In the Sichuan and Chongqing regions alone, there are many catering stores that use "green peppercorns" as door promotions. If you register it as a trademark, you can successfully protect your rights. I think there will be more rights protection cases such as "red pepper" and "red pepper" in the future.

This kind of rights protection behavior is not supported in the end, which is a voice of justice. The verdict passed by the Sichuan High Court gave these defendants business fair and justice. 2. I want to use typical cases to express the judicial position

In the past year, there have been many similar rights infringement cases, and some merchants have suffered huge losses as a result. Not only do you need to apologize and change the door, you also need to compensate for the infringement losses. The Green Pepper Case is very representative and persuasive; selecting the Green Pepper Case to the Supreme Court will serve as a good warning and significantly reduce the frequency of such rights protection cases.

Legal fairness and justice are the most important. When faced with some "confrontational" rights protection practices, we should reject them to ensure legal fairness and justice, and at the same time put an end to bad rights protection trends.