Let's just say that cycling is very expensive, and the most fundamental reason is that cars are expensive, which means that you can't even buy a decent frame at this price-400 yuan can't buy a good shelf, and 400 to 600 can buy a professional one, but it's just a professional introduction.
As for Rex and Warriors 18 mentioned upstairs, you don't have to consider it at all.
I haven't seen Rex's car, but I have seen its trademark. Both patterns and words are deliberately imitating Lexus (now translated as "Lexus", Toyota's high-end brand), which is a cottage to put it bluntly;
I just checked the information of this brand and found that the company's website can't get in. Then I checked the product pictures and found that this brand of car is completely rubbish, just using a shiny appearance to attract attention, just like Xidesheng and Orwitt.
Warriors 18 is not much better.
Warrior 18 is a product of Merida. Although Merida is a world-class brand, it does not mean that Warrior 18 is a world-class bicycle. On the contrary, it is also rubbish. On the other hand, Santana and Phaeton are not comparable, although they are both products of Volkswagen.
Let's take a look at its specific configuration: the performance of the frame (the frame is the soul of the whole car) is unknown, but it should not be good from the price point of view, and there is no room for improvement; The speed control system uses TX, which is the lowest-end product of Shimano. The front fork has Merida's trademark, which is estimated to be OEM and there is no room for upgrading. The damping effect of two sticks and a spring is even more flattering.
The most critical part is like this, and the performance of other parts can be imagined. This kind of car can be bought at 1000, which is completely Merida's brand advantage. If you change the same configuration to other second-line brands, you can buy less than 800 at most. Why buy such a car?
Walking for a long time, I almost forgot to get to the point.
The structure of mountain bike is relatively complex, which means that the failure rate will be higher, and the so-called "mountain bike" with low price is actually just the appearance of mountain bike, and its performance can't reach the standard at all. It's not worth buying something with low performance and high failure rate.
The same is true for road bikes, which are more expensive than mountain bikes of the same quality. What's more, using road bikes in complex terrain is a complete waste of things, and it is also a toss-up, which is also not worth buying.
The best choice for walking instead of walking is a light bicycle. This thing is very solid, and riding for two or three years is not a problem at all. The most common faults encountered in the middle can be solved by correcting steel rings and replacing brake pads. Speaking of heaven, it is to change the flywheel, which is very cheap to buy and maintain. The only drawback is that it doesn't look very good.
Finally, add another sentence: if you want to buy a mountain bike, you must be willing to spend money. Everything below 1500 is rubbish, so don't consider it; /kloc-more than 0/500 are entry-level, you can make do, just make do; From 2000 to 4000, they are basically chicken ribs with all functions, but none of them are complete. It is useless to keep them and it is a pity to throw them away. 4000 to 6000 can be equipped with a professional entry level, and it is no problem to climb mountains and mountains; Further up is the competitive level, the price is hard to say, and it is also a bottomless pit, depending on what accessories you use, such as a large XTR kit, which is nearly 10,000 yuan.
what do you think? Have you decided to buy a light car? Trust me, that's right, hehe.