The procedures for trademark administrative litigation are as follows: (1) If the trademark holder is dissatisfied with the decision made by the Trademark Office or the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, he may file a lawsuit with the People's Court. (2) After receiving the complaint and reviewing it, the People's Court will file the case within 7 days or make a ruling not to accept it. For accepted cases, a copy of the complaint will be sent to the defendant within 5 days from the date of filing. (3) The defendant shall submit relevant materials for specific administrative actions to the People's Court within 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the complaint, and submit a statement of defense. If the defendant fails to submit a statement of defense, it will not affect the People's Court's trial in accordance with the law. (4) The execution of specific administrative acts shall not be stopped during the litigation period, except for the following circumstances: 1. The defendant believes that execution needs to be stopped; 2. The plaintiff applies to stop execution, and the People's Court believes that the execution of the specific administrative acts will cause irreparable losses, and the People's Court shall rule Stop execution. (5) If the law stipulates that execution is suspended, the people's court will make the following different rulings after trial: 1. If the specific administrative act involves any of the following behaviors: insufficient main evidence, wrong application of law, violation of legal procedures, exceeding of authority, abuse of authority, etc., the people's court shall make the following rulings: Cancellation or partial revocation, and the defendant may be sentenced to re-take specific administrative actions; 2. If the evidence for the specific administrative actions is conclusive, the applicable law is correct, and the legal procedures are complied with, the judgment shall be upheld. 3. If the defendant fails to perform or delays in performing statutory duties, he shall be sentenced to perform within a certain period of time. If the administrative penalty is obviously unjust, the judgment may be changed. Article 35 of the Trademark Law: If an objection is raised against a trademark that has been initially approved and announced, the Trademark Office shall listen to the facts and reasons stated by the opponent and the opposed party, and after investigation and verification, the Trademark Office shall issue a notice within 12 months from the expiration of the announcement period. Make a decision on whether to grant registration within 12 days, and notify the opponent and the person being opposed in writing. If there are special circumstances that require an extension, it can be extended for six months with the approval of the industrial and commercial administration department of the State Council. If the Trademark Office makes a decision to approve registration, it will issue a trademark registration certificate and make an announcement. If the opponent is dissatisfied, he may request the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board to declare the registered trademark invalid in accordance with the provisions of Articles 44 and 45 of this Law. If the Trademark Office makes a decision not to register and the opponent is dissatisfied, he or she may apply to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review within fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice. The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board shall make a review decision within twelve months from the date of receipt of the application, and notify the opponent and the opposed party in writing. If there are special circumstances that require an extension, it can be extended for six months with the approval of the industrial and commercial administration department of the State Council. If the opposed party is dissatisfied with the decision of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, it may file a lawsuit with the People's Court within thirty days from the date of receipt of the notice. The people's court shall notify the opponent to participate in the litigation as a third party. During the review process in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may suspend the review if the determination of the prior rights involved must be based on the results of another case that is being heard by the people's court or is being handled by the administrative agency. After the reasons for the suspension are eliminated, the review process should be resumed.