There are the following reasons for not involving infringement:

1. Some have indicated the source.

2. Some just provide the material for the work.

3. There is no accountability requirement for these stolen original videos.

4. These stolen publications are not commercial in nature, and do not damage the rights and interests of the original author. On the contrary, they have played a certain propaganda role and are also beneficial to the cited party.

TV dramas are generally copyrighted, so when using the content of TV dramas, you should obtain the consent of the copyright owner of TV dramas before you can use them. There are some TV dramas in Tik Tok platform, which have been authorized by the copyright owner, allowing users of Tik Tok platform to use them on Tik Tok platform, so even if users use them, they will not infringe the rights of the copyright owners of TV dramas.

However, if the Tik Tok platform does not have the copyright owner's permission to edit, adapt or change the content of the works without the copyright owner's permission, it will constitute infringement. If you don't want to infringe, you need to be authorized by the copyright owner before using it.

In the following cases, the people's court may preliminarily determine that the defendant has intentionally infringed intellectual property rights:

(1) The defendant continues to commit infringement after being notified and warned by the plaintiff or interested party.

(2) The defendant or his legal representative or manager is the legal representative, manager or actual controller of the plaintiff or interested party.

(3) The defendant has labor, labor, cooperation, licensing, distribution, agency, representation and other relations with the plaintiff or interested parties, and has been exposed to the infringed intellectual property rights.

(4) The defendant has business dealings with the plaintiff or interested parties, or has negotiated for the conclusion of a contract, and has been exposed to infringed intellectual property rights.

(5) The defendant commits piracy or counterfeiting of a registered trademark.

(6) Other circumstances that can be identified as intentional. Article 4 The people's court shall comprehensively consider the means and times of infringement, the duration, geographical scope, scale and consequences of the infringement, the infringer's behavior in litigation and other factors in determining the seriousness of the infringement of intellectual property rights.

The people's court may consider the defendant's circumstances as serious if he/she has the following circumstances:

(1) The defendant commits the same or similar infringement again after being given administrative punishment for infringement or being held liable by a court judgment.

(2) infringement of intellectual property rights.

(3) forging, destroying or concealing evidence of infringement.

(4) refusing to perform the preservation ruling.

(5) Infringement gains or the obligee suffers huge losses.

(6) Infringement may endanger national security, public interests or personal health.

(7) Other circumstances that can be considered as serious.