Reviews are risky, but based on personal experience, I think there are also breakthroughs. First of all, you can find the difference with the cited trademark. Your trademark is water paint, and the cited word is water. The Chinese characters for water paint and water are obviously different and have different meanings. Your focus is paint, and the cited water is based on the consumption habits of people in our country. It is not easy to confuse and misidentify water and water paint during use, so it can be explained that they are not similar to the cited trademarks. Let’s look at the second reason for rejection. Your reason for rejection is that it is easy to cause misunderstanding when used on specific products. It means that your trademark is water paint, but the products you registered are not other products within the scope of water paint. However, based on the cited trademark, we can explain that the reason is not valid. The reason is that the cited trademark is Water Guard. The product of the cited trademark is paint, and its use on a specific product may easily lead to misidentification. The cited trademark also falls into this category. In order to reflect the fairness, standard and uniformity of trademark review and trial, it can be stated that the reason for rejection is not valid. Personal opinion.