This problem should be related to the recent trademark dispute of iPad. I would like to remind you that there is a difference between "seizure" (seizure and seizure) and "confiscation". The former is an administrative compulsory measure to stop illegal acts and control the expansion of losses, while the latter is an administrative punishment for acts violating administrative order. The seizure of iPad by local industrial and commercial authorities is an administrative compulsory measure, which is a temporary control of property, not a final disposal. If there is evidence or reason that it should not be sealed up, the industrial and commercial authorities shall promptly lift the sealing measures. It is completely reasonable to question and criticize the improper administrative law enforcement of the industrial and commercial bureau, but the premise is to clarify its specific law enforcement content. It is not completely impossible to understand "seizure" as "confiscation" or even "taking home" by the people of the industrial and commercial bureau (of course, in a case).