Letv and Xiaomi, the first choice for domestic brands with poor picture quality, can't be called TV at all, but Konka and Skyworth are the second worst, and in terms of quality, everyone is just so-so (TCL, Hisense, Haier, Changhong, Panda, etc.). To put it bluntly, at present, domestic brands just buy a screen, a case and a driver board to assemble them, and they all fight for cost and sales, with little technical investment and R&D funds. Therefore, the picture quality of domestic TVs is naturally very ordinary, and the after-sales are also very ordinary. Once something goes wrong, you will try every means to evade them. Personally, I think that if you want to buy goods above 4, yuan, there is no need to buy domestic brands. At present, the best quality and picture quality of TV sets are the Japanese version, the American version and the Western European version, which are sold to Europe and America and kept by Japan for their own use. In Japan, Toshiba has the best sales and usage reputation, followed by Sony. In 214, Japan's audio-visual fever industry recognized the evaluation results of the two most professional A/V magazines. Toshiba 55Z9X and Sony X95B ranked first in 4K image quality, while Toshiba 5Z8X ranked first in 213, followed by Sony 55X92a and Sharp 55UD1. The king of 2K image quality is Toshiba 55Z7 and Sony 65HX95. . The Hong Kong version and other Asia-Pacific versions are OK, but the mainland version is actually the worst. The grades of circuit chips and panels have shrunk in various ways, and they have shrunk secretly. However, Chinese people have always worshipped foreign countries and have low taste, only looking at their appearance and functions. Like to be fooled, so few people can detect it. To buy a TV, I recommend you to look at the professional evaluation in Japan. The so-called evaluation agencies in mainland China have low qualifications, and the editors have little knowledge. Most of them accept the money from the manufacturers. The so-called evaluation is completely nonsense and touting. Basically, it has no reference value. Therefore, the original Japanese goods are completely different from those sold in the mainland. . The picture quality of Samsung TV has never been superior. Samsung's good thing is the panel. In 28 and 29, the original picture quality of the black crystal S-PVA panel was very good, with high contrast and dark black, which was adopted by Sony and Toshiba's high-end LCD. However, the cost was high. After the panel factory that Sony and Samsung cooperated separated, Samsung stopped production of black crystal in 21. Later, the so-called PVA panels were all cheap and shrunk, and the picture quality was greatly retrogressed. . Last year's Samsung TV was smashed by a great god in the forum. Its TV set was divided into a beta version and a market version. Once, the market version of F8 was accidentally sent to an evaluation agency, and it was measured that the blue level overflowed and the green level was ultra-low. The overall picture quality was blue, the contrast was strange, and the color was light. Later, Samsung gave some money through public relations, saying that it sent the wrong machine and sent a beta version for evaluation again. It was very cheap, right? After 12 years, the image quality of Samsung's ES series and F series has greatly declined, and the domestic PVA panel index has shrunk dramatically, using Suzhou garbage W-LED as backlight. Seeing those Samsung-sponsored F8 TVs in TVB's Love Home, and the Samsung TVs of some current affairs programs of China Southern TV Station, the degree of blue picture is outrageous and the picture quality is disgusting. . However, Samsung's after-sales service is very good. As long as you find serious light leakage, bad spots and scratches, they will be replaced with new machines very crisply. . Sharp is not a good thing either. Among Japanese manufacturers, shrinking it is the oldest qualification. Taiwan Province panel was first used, and four-color UV technology and Japanese original panel were blown. But if you actually saw the picture quality, you felt that it was all fart, dynamic blur, and the black position was a mess. Some series still had color cast problems, and people's skin was pig liver color. Sharp's high-end panels, even reluctant to use them, are mostly used as monitors, and the effect is very good. However, only a few models of XS1A RX1 are decentralized for civilian use, and X5 is qualified. Later, the so-called middle and high-end LX93, LX95A, LX85 and LX73A are all unqualified, but the price is still expensive. . Sharp himself shrank, but also brought several other good Japanese brands, and Sony, Toshiba and Panasonic followed suit. . Now the Sharp LCD factory has been sold to Foxconn. The high-grade Kameyama panel was discontinued as early as 211, and now it is mass-produced with cheap shrink panels, and the cost can be controlled. Sharp's after-sales service is quite satisfactory, and the customer service looks like a high-flying. Let's talk about LG. Before 212, the LCD image quality of LG was quite satisfactory. In 28 and 29, LG's own IPS TV had a strong sense of oil painting, and it didn't like it very much. The so-called XD engine of LG didn't see any great improvement in dynamic definition and standard definition, non-point-to-point image quality, but the standard definition optimization technology level was ordinary. Color matching technology of Korean TV ...

Which brand of TV is better

Letv and Xiaomi, the first choice of domestic brands with poor image quality, can't be called TV at all, and Konka and Skyworth are the second worst, but in terms of quality, everyone is just so-so (TCL, Hisense, Haier, Changhong, Panda, etc.). To put it bluntly, at present, domestic brands are just buying a screen, casing and driving board to assemble. Therefore, the picture quality of domestic TVs is naturally very ordinary, and the after-sales are also very ordinary. Once something goes wrong, you will try every means to evade them. Personally, I think that if you want to buy goods above 4, yuan, there is no need to buy domestic brands.

at present, the best quality and picture quality of TV sets are the Japanese version, the American version and the Western European version, which are sold to Europe and America in Japan and kept for their own use. In Japan, Toshiba has the best sales volume and reputation, followed by Sony. Toshiba Z8X, Sony X92a and Sharp UD1 are the best in 4K picture quality, while Toshiba 55Z7 and Sony 65HX95 are the best in 2K picture quality. . The Hong Kong version and other Asia-Pacific versions are OK, while the mainland version is actually the worst, with various levels of circuit chips and panels shrinking, and even shrinking secretly. However, Chinese people have always worshipped foreign countries and have low taste, and like to be fooled, so few people can detect it. .

To buy a TV, I recommend you to look at the professional evaluation in Japan. The so-called evaluation agencies in mainland China have a low level of qualification, and their editors have little knowledge. Most of them accept money from manufacturers. The so-called evaluation is completely nonsense and touting. Basically, it has no reference value. .

the picture quality of Samsung TV has never been superior. Samsung's good thing is the panel. In 28 and 29, the original picture quality of the black crystal S-PVA panel was very good, with high contrast and dark black, which was adopted by Sony and Toshiba's high-end LCD, but the cost was high. After the panel factory that Sony and Samsung cooperated separated, Samsung stopped production of black crystal in 21. Later, the so-called PVA panels were all cheap and shrunk, with high picture quality. . Last year's Samsung TV was smashed by a great god in the forum. Its TV set was divided into a beta version and a market version. Once, the market version of F8 was accidentally sent to an evaluation agency, and it was measured that the blue level overflowed and the green level was ultra-low. The overall picture quality was blue, the contrast was strange, and the color was light. Later, Samsung gave some money through public relations, saying that it sent the wrong machine and sent a beta version for evaluation again. It was very cheap, right? After 12 years, the image quality of Samsung's ES series and F series has greatly declined, and the domestic PVA panel index has shrunk dramatically, using Suzhou garbage W-LED as backlight. Seeing those Samsung-sponsored F8 TVs in TVB's Love Home, and the Samsung TVs of some current affairs programs of China Southern TV Station, the degree of blue picture is outrageous and the picture quality is disgusting. .

However, Samsung's after-sales service is very good. As long as you find serious light leakage, bad spots and scratches, they will be replaced with new ones very crisply. .

Sharp is not a good thing either. Among Japanese manufacturers, shrinking it is the oldest qualification. Taiwan Province panel was first used, and four-color UV technology and Japanese original panel were blown. But if you actually saw the picture quality, you felt that it was all fart, dynamic blur, and the black position was a mess. Some series still had color cast problems, and people's skin was pig liver color. Sharp's high-end panels, even reluctant to use them, are mostly used as monitors, and the effect is very good. However, only a few models of XS1A RX1 are decentralized for civilian use, and X5 is considered qualified. Later, the so-called middle and high-end LX93, LX95A, LX85 and LX73A are all unqualified, but the price is still expensive. . Sharp himself shrank, but also brought several other good Japanese brands, and Sony, Toshiba and Panasonic followed suit. . Now the Sharp LCD factory has been sold to Foxconn, and the advanced Kameyama panel has been discontinued as early as 11 years ago. Sharp's after-sales service is quite satisfactory, with a high profile.

Let's talk about LG. Before 12 years, the LCD picture quality of LG was quite satisfactory. In 28 and 29, LG's own IPS TV had a strong sense of oil painting, and it didn't like it very much. The so-called XD engine of LG didn't improve much in dynamic definition and standard definition and non-point-to-point picture level, but the standard definition optimization technology level was ordinary. The color matching technology and picture processing technology of Korean TV were always average, far less than those of Japan. The overall cost performance is average. . Twelve years later, a small universe broke out. Starting from the LM series, the image quality improved significantly, the price was fair, and the conscience was good. . However, since 14 years, the image quality of the new GB series has actually started to shrink to a certain extent, getting worse, and the price is a little more expensive than the LA series, which is a bit pitted, which was discovered by the forum gods. In terms of after-sales, LG's IPS LCD produced in Guangzhou is very good ...

Which brand of TV is better than which brand of home TV is better

At present, the brand of domestic TV is not worse than that of imported TV, and the price is favorable, the after-sales service is better and the after-sales cost is lower.

Hisense and skyworth are preferred. Followed by Haier and tcl ace. Konka and Changhong followed, followed by local brands such as Xoceco and Panda, and finally emerging brands such as Xiaomi and LeTV.

which TV brand is the best now?

Letv and Xiaomi, the first choice of domestic brands with poor image quality, can't be called TV at all, but Konka and Skyworth are the second worst, but in terms of quality, everyone is just so-so (TCL, Hisense, Haier, Changhong, Panda, etc.). To put it bluntly, at present, domestic brands only buy a screen, a case and a driver board to assemble them, and they all fight for cost and sales, with little technical investment and R&D funds. Therefore, the picture quality of domestic TVs is naturally very ordinary, and the after-sales are also very ordinary. Once something goes wrong, you will try every means to evade them. Personally, I think that if you want to buy goods above 4, yuan, there is no need to buy domestic brands.

at present, the best quality and picture quality of TV sets are the Japanese version, the American version and the Western European version, which are sold to Europe and the United States and kept by Japan for their own use. In Japan, Toshiba has the best sales and usage reputation, followed by Sony.

in 214, the evaluation results of two most professional A/V magazines were recognized by Japanese audio-visual fever circles. Toshiba 55Z9X and Sony X95B ranked first in the 4K image quality, while Toshiba 55Z8X ranked first in 213, followed by Sony 55X92a and Sharp 55UD1. The king of 2K image quality is Toshiba 55Z7 and Sony 65HX95. .

the Asia-Pacific version such as the Hong Kong version is ok, but the mainland version is actually the worst. The grades of circuit chips and panels have shrunk in various ways, and they have shrunk secretly. However, Chinese people have always worshipped foreign countries and have low taste, only looking at their appearance and functions. Like to be fooled, so few people can detect it.

To buy a TV, I recommend you to look at the professional evaluation in Japan. The so-called evaluation agencies in mainland China have a low level of qualification, and their editors have little knowledge. Most of them accept money from manufacturers. The so-called evaluation is completely nonsense and touting. Basically, it has no reference value. Therefore, the original Japanese goods are completely different from those sold in the mainland. .

the picture quality of Samsung TV has never been superior. Samsung's good thing is the panel. In 28 and 29, the original picture quality of the black crystal S-PVA panel was very good, with high contrast and dark black, which was adopted by Sony and Toshiba's high-end LCD, but the cost was high. After the panel factory that Sony and Samsung cooperated separated, Samsung stopped production of black crystal in 21. Later, the so-called PVA panels were all cheap and shrunk, with high picture quality. . Last year's Samsung TV was smashed by a great god in the forum. Its TV set was divided into a beta version and a market version. Once, the market version of F8 was accidentally sent to an evaluation agency, and it was measured that the blue level overflowed and the green level was ultra-low. The overall picture quality was blue, the contrast was strange, and the color was light. Later, Samsung gave some money through public relations, saying that it sent the wrong machine and sent a beta version for evaluation again. It was very cheap, right? After 12 years, the image quality of Samsung's ES series and F series has greatly declined, and the domestic PVA panel index has shrunk dramatically, using Suzhou garbage W-LED as backlight. Seeing those Samsung-sponsored F8 TVs in TVB's Love Home, and the Samsung TVs of some current affairs programs of China Southern TV Station, the degree of blue picture is outrageous and the picture quality is disgusting. .

However, Samsung's after-sales service is very good. As long as you find serious light leakage, bad spots and scratches, they will be replaced with new ones very crisply. .

Sharp is not a good thing either. Among Japanese manufacturers, shrinking it is the oldest qualification. Taiwan Province panel was first used, and four-color UV technology and Japanese original panel were blown. But if you actually saw the picture quality, you felt that it was all fart, dynamic blur, and the black position was a mess. Some series still had color cast problems, and people's skin was pig liver color. Sharp's high-end panels, even reluctant to use them, are mostly used as monitors, and the effect is very good. However, only a few models of XS1A RX1 are decentralized for civilian use, and X5 is qualified. Later, the so-called middle and high-end LX93, LX95A, LX85 and LX73A are all unqualified, but the price is still expensive. . Sharp himself shrank, but also brought several other good Japanese brands, and Sony, Toshiba and Panasonic followed suit. . Now the Sharp LCD factory has been sold to Foxconn. The high-grade Kameyama panel was discontinued as early as 211, and now it is mass-produced with cheap shrink panels, and the cost can be controlled. Sharp's after-sales service is quite satisfactory, and the customer service looks like a high-flying.

Let's talk about LG. Before 212, the LCD image quality of LG was quite satisfactory. In 28 and 29, LG's own IPS TV had a strong sense of oil painting and didn't like it very much. The so-called XD engine of LG didn't see any great improvement in dynamic definition and standard definition and non-point-to-point image quality, but the standard definition optimization technology was ordinary. Color matching technology of Korean TV ...

What brand of TV is good in quality

Top Ten LCD TV brands

1 Sony (Japan in 1946, world brand, leading brand of high-end LCD display in the world)

2 SHARP (1912 Japan in 1912, leading brand of high-end LCD display in the world)

3 SAMSUNG (1969 South Korea in 1969) China's well-known trademark, national inspection exemption, top ten TV brands)

4 Hisense (China's famous trademark, China's famous trademark, first-line brand/brand, top ten TV brands)

5 LG LCD TV (South Korea's first-line brand/brand, top ten LCD TV brands in 1947)

6 SKYWORTH Skyworth (China's famous brand, China).