The case of personal injury compensation for road traffic accidents between Lu Hui and Li Zhiming and Mitsubishi Automobile Industry Co., Ltd., which attracted wide attention from all walks of life, was heard in the Furong District People's Court. The plaintiff Lu Hui's husband and agent, the first defendant Li Zhiming and his agent, and the agent of the second defendant Mitsubishi Automobile Industry Co., Ltd. attended the lawsuit.
On December 25th, 2, Lu Hui was injured by a car with license plate number Xiang A·4945 driven by Li Zhiming. After identification by the traffic police department, Li Zhiming was mainly responsible and Lu Hui was secondary. On March 27th, 22, Lu Hui filed a lawsuit in the People's Court of Furong District, demanding that both defendants * * * compensate 3.364 million yuan.
In the court, the three parties conducted sufficient evidence, cross-examination and heated debate. The focus of the three parties' debate is the sharing of accident responsibility and whether the accident vehicle is a car produced by Mitsubishi Automobile Industry Co., Ltd. of Japan. Lu Huifang believes that his injury was caused by the car that Li Zhiming was driving. Xiang A·4945 was a Mitsubishi Pajero V31 jeep produced by Mitsubishi Motors Corporation of Japan, and Li Zhiming and Mitsubishi Motors Corporation of Japan should be jointly and severally liable for compensation. Li Zhiming argued that Lu Hui should bear the responsibility for the accident, and the accident was caused by the quality problems of the Mitsubishi car she was driving, so she should not bear the responsibility. Japan's Mitsubishi Automobile Industry Co., Ltd. believes that the accident car was not produced by the company, but was produced by a car modification factory in Hanshou, and the company should not bear the responsibility.
due to the complexity of the case, the court failed to make a judgment in court. Changsha Evening News
Replay of Lu Hui Incident
On December 25th, 2, 3-year-old Lu Hui was hit by a Japanese Mitsubishi Pajero V31 car in Xiaowumen, Changsha, causing paralysis.
On February 16th, 21, the accident vehicle was sent to Hunan Quality Supervision Bureau for identification. The report concluded that the cause of the accident was the improper design of the vehicle itself.
On February 17th, 21, the agent of the victim Lu Hui sent a letter of claim to Mitsubishi Corporation Beijing Branch.
On February 27th, 21, Mitsubishi Company "temporarily advanced" 12, yuan to the hospital account where Lu Hui was treated, but denied the nature of compensation.
On April 17th, 21, Lu Hui was identified as a first-class disability by the Forensic Medicine Inspection Institute of Changsha Public Security Bureau.
On July 3rd, 21, Lu Hui's husband Zhou Jianhong wrote to the Beijing office of Mitsubishi Motors Corporation again, hoping that the compensation problem would be solved as soon as possible, so as not to lose faith with China consumers.
On November 27th, 21, Lu Hui arrived in Beijing with her husband Zhou Jianhong, her sister and her agent.
On December 3, 21, representatives of Mitsubishi Motors visited Lu Hui's residence and expressed their willingness to settle the matter through friendly negotiation.
On December 14th, 21, Mitsubishi Motors Corporation issued a statement on the Internet, stating that after investigation, the vehicle involved in the accident was "assembled by using the trademark of Mitsubishi Motors Corporation without the consent and permission of Mitsubishi Motors Corporation and without the knowledge of Mitsubishi Motors Corporation", and that "Mitsubishi Motors Corporation is not liable for this incident". I hope that the "Lu Hui incident" can be resolved in accordance with relevant laws and procedures in the future.
On December 15th, 21, Lu Hui's husband Zhou Jianhong issued a statement, saying that the responsibility of Mitsubishi Corporation of Japan in the accident was beyond doubt.
On March 27th, 22, Lu Hui's family brought Mitsubishi Motors of Japan to court.
On June 28th, 22, Lu Hui and her family were informed by the court to postpone the court session.
On April 4th, 23, Lu Hui's case was heard in the People's Court of Furong District.
Panasonic incident
The incident occurred on January 4th, 27 (the first day when the middle shift of the nickel-cadmium workshop in the first factory of the company started to strike). It happened here >: Before birth, the company has not reported the physical examination of personnel in August 25 to all employees of the company, and some of them have worked in the factory for a long time >: For employees who have only been working for 4 years and 5 years, the company has not sent the physical examination reports of previous years to employees. > On January 4, 27, at the strong request of employees, the company was forced to check the urine cadmium in the physical examination report of August 26. Copies of the column were sent to employees. In the copies sent, employees found that the date of physical examination was not attached to the date of inspection, and some of them were sent > The date of medical examination turned out to be May 26, and some medical examination dates were not attached to the report date (some employees' medical examination dates were August 26 >; 18th, and the report date is August 16th, 26). On the copy of the original report of cadmium in urine, there are all hands > Writing style, without the seal of Wuxi Center for Disease Control, and the examiner and checker actually wrote by hand instead of the seal, and the notes were not >; Often close. And the most important column of urine cadmium test is all written by hand instead of printed by computer. > Wuxi Panasonic battery has concealed the truth from its employees and deceived them, which has caused great harm to all employees. > On the morning of January 8, more than 1,3 employees from five departments of a factory went on strike, and emotional employees were blocked at the factory gate > Mouth for more than 8 hours! ~ after making more than n calls, no media in Jiangsu dared to sweat! Under the rogue, the workers chose five generations > Table to negotiate with the company! ~ The employee asked to go to the Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention for re-examination! But the company called the provincial center for disease control and prevention a lamp > If it is broken, it is impossible to have a physical examination, and only the Changzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention is allowed to bring equipment to the company to have a physical examination for employees! ~> On January 9, the company forced its employees to return to work without any results in the negotiations! ~ and lied to the employee representative > Make an agreement to cheat employees in the next time. In addition > The results of some employees' physical examination in Nanjing at their own expense will be released on January 9! ~ 9 people who went to the computer to print the body with the doctor's name stamp > The physical examination results are much higher than those in the company! ~ the contradiction is further intensified ~! In the afternoon, the company lied about working with > Staff negotiation, after the staff waited for more than 3 hours! ~ the company secretly held a meeting of the bottom leaders, threatening the inducements > Workers, not workers forced dismissal, workers can start in 8 yuan ~! Such despicable means are really annoying, BS! ~ institute > None of the relevant units dare to stand out for their employees ~! Now employees are worried ~! > I don't know whether it is the sorrow of the country or the sorrow of the nation! ~ Does the China government really want to please foreign-funded enterprises so much > Chinese people's health, who cares about despising the China government, despising the news media, and overthrowing the Japanese, long live the working class in China! Please support the strike movement of Panasonic employees in Wuxi and hit Japanese imperialism!
JAL incident
Dozens of China consumers who took JAL flights are going to jointly file a lawsuit and claim compensation from JAL recently. The reason is that the company "seriously violated the basic rights of passengers in China" and gave "discriminatory treatment" to passengers in China.
On the morning of 16th, the reporter interviewed Li Hao, a passenger representative from China who wanted to jointly sue. Li Hao showed the reporter a "power of attorney" with the signatures of 63 China passengers. They entrusted Li Hao to hire a lawyer to file a lawsuit against JAL, in order to "seek justice and compensate for the losses".
As an ordinary businessman, Li Hao recalled the voyage and said it was "a nightmare". At 15: on January 27th this year, dozens of passengers from all over China and passengers from other countries and regions boarded JAL flight JL782 at Beijing Airport. According to the original plan, the plane will land at Narita International Airport in Tokyo at 18: on the same day. After that, these China passengers will transfer flights to the United States, Canada, Brazil and other places. Their respective transit visas and air tickets allow them to stay in Japan for 72 hours.
at 18: on the 27th, the on-board broadcast told everyone that it was snowing heavily in Tokyo, so I don't know if Narita Airport could land. I hope passengers will wait patiently. After 4 minutes, the plane informed Tokyo that it could not land and the plane would fly to Osaka. At the same time, it showed that Japan Airlines would properly solve everyone's connecting flight problem. At 2 o'clock on the 27th, the flight arrived in Osaka, but passengers were not allowed to disembark.
About two hours later, JAL began to pick up the Japanese and western guests on the flight, and offered 2, yen to each Japanese passenger, asking the China passengers on board to "wait patiently". It was not until about 23: on the 27th that dozens of China passengers were allowed to disembark and enter a lobby of Osaka Airport under the guidance of a JAL stewardess. There was no seat for passengers to rest in the lobby.
When China passengers asked for temporary accommodation, the only Japanese attendant in the hall said that he could do nothing and could not solve anything. When the Japanese duty officer found that there were two blond western passengers among the passengers, he politely released them, while those who held Chinese passports were not allowed to leave! Later, when everyone's passport was checked, guests from Taiwan Province, China were also allowed to leave.
Li Hao recalled with excitement that the situation of China passengers in the lobby of Osaka Airport was "miserable" and "almost confined". Some of them include the elderly and patients; An elderly couple lay on the cold marble floor without even a sip of water. At 3am on 28th, China passengers were taken to a place upstairs in the lobby, and each person was given a small sandwich, but there was still no drinking water.
at 13: on the 28th, the plane arrived at Tokyo Narita Airport. According to JAL's arrangement, from 17: onwards, the connecting passengers from China boarded flights to their respective destinations.
Li Hao said that during the connecting flight in Tokyo on the 28th, Japanese passengers found the passenger department of JAL, and a staff member named Iida Shengli received them. China passengers left their own phone numbers, hoping that JAL could reply as soon as possible, but there was no result in the future.
Li Hao said, firstly, JAL ignored the basic rights of China passengers, which made us unable to guarantee the basic requirements of eating, drinking, sleeping and going to the toilet, and violated the basic personal rights and personality rights of China passengers. Second, JAL was seriously discriminatory in this incident, and different passengers on the same plane were treated differently. Third, JAL has seriously violated international aviation regulations, causing great physical and mental harm to passengers. Fourth, JAL is deceptive to passengers, deceiving China passengers. Fifth, the air ticket includes room and board, and JAL is in serious breach of contract.
As a representative of dozens of China passengers, Li Hao said that JAL's behavior is a great insult to the national dignity and personality of China tourists, and their claim amount is at least 1 million yen per person, about 1 million yuan, the most important of which is mental compensation.