second, the two logo, VIP Bird and Nike, are graphics in nature, not letters, and the review of graphics is more complicated. There are many aspects to consider. First, there is little difference between the two graphic designs, and secondly, the examiner lists them in which graphic element to review (the examiner is subjective, so the review result cannot be determined). The third is whether the two logo will confuse ordinary consumers and mistake them for the products of the same company. The fourth is that even if one of the trademarks is cited to reject the other trademark, whether the rejected trademark is widely used and whether it has great influence in the same industry can be proved in the rejection review, which will affect whether the trademark will be approved for registration.
Third, the success of VIP Bird does not mean that all applications can be successfully made only by modifying and deforming, because it depends on whether the logo is substantially similar, and whether it is a malicious cybersquatting behavior according to the reasons in the second answer. Even if the similar trademark finally passes the examination and announcement, we can object to the other party's trademark during the announcement period to safeguard our rights.