After the glory of the king was accused of plagiarism, the supplier responded that there was no plagiarism. The supplier said that the artist created it himself and did not copy other materials. Netizens feel a little ambiguous about this response, because plagiarism itself is difficult to be characterized, so suppliers in the glory of the king can't admit it. In fact, this is not the first time that something similar has happened. There are many plagiarism incidents exposed before, but most of them are the result of holding high and putting down lightly.

Because plagiarism is really difficult to be judged as a standard, sometimes the similarity between two works is really high, but this does not mean that there must be plagiarism. Perhaps these factors are very extensive, so it is normal for different designers to have the same idea, so you can't directly characterize two very similar things as plagiarism. As long as the designers and suppliers themselves are unwilling to admit it, then this plagiarism may only end in vain.

Of course, we still need to crack down on plagiarism, because plagiarism is a practice that does not respect the intellectual property rights of others, and not many people may be willing to be original after plagiarism. This phenomenon is terrible, so I hope everyone will support absolute originality, but don't slander others and plagiarize at will. Don't discourage others blindly, but respect originality to see more and better works.

This matter may be over, but I hope there will be no similar controversy in the future, otherwise the the glory of the king game will lose everyone's attention bit by bit. As long as it is a qualified original, it will be recognized by everyone, and there is no need for game companies to copy it. Not only games, but also any design should not copy other people's works. I hope everyone can firmly engrave this idea in their own minds.