Article 1 A court established in accordance with Article 1 of the Constitution of the United States.
United States Federal Claims Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
American Trademark Review and Adjudication Board
Patent Complaints and Conflicts Committee of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Contract Appeal Board (Government Contract Affairs)
American merit system protection Committee
United States International Trade Commission
Article 3 A court established in accordance with Article 3 of the Constitution of the United States
American International Trade Court
The U.S. Federal District Court is concerned with the following matters:
Patents, including appeals arising from lawsuits filed against the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office under 35 U.S.C Section 145;
LitterTucker Act, 28 U.S.C. 1346
1970 Section 2 of the Economic Stability Act11
Section 5 of Emergency Oil Distribution Act 1973
Section 506 (c) of Natural Gas Policy Act 1978
Article 523 of the Energy Policy and Protection Law
Generally speaking, CAFC will accept all appeals from any U.S. federal district court as long as the original lawsuit contains claims based on patent law. However, according to the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States, if the patent claim is only filed by the defendant as a counterclaim, it does not have to be accepted by CAFC. However, although other appeal courts can also accept patent counterclaims in theory, in practice, this situation does not happen often.
A remarkable feature of CAFC is that its judgments, especially those involving patent cases, have become binding precedents in the United States. This is different from other 12 federal appeals courts, whose decisions only become binding precedents in their geographical areas. CAFC's decision can only be overturned by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States or the relevant amendments to the statute law. Since the decision to review CAFC depends on the discretion of the Supreme Court of the United States, in fact, in most cases, CAFC's decision is final, especially because CAFC has exclusive jurisdiction over related matters, and there is no so-called "circuit division" (that is, the appeal courts in different circuit areas have different interpretations of federal laws).