2. I have a Canon 5D myself. Although12 million is a poor parameter at present, the actual imaging is very delicate and the high ISO tolerance is good. Even the two-handed 5D is a very popular product at present. The disadvantage is that the viewfinder is easy to accumulate dust, although it does not affect the imaging. 5D2 didn't start, just grabbed the used, wide viewfinder, and was conquered by it when I raised the camera to focus, and nothing else was said. Sony a900 has never been used, it's hard to say, but as the saying goes, Sony is used for Zeiss lenses. If you don't use it for Zeiss, why not use Sony? Just use it if you like German style imaging.
3. 1D4 is APS-H series, and its focal length is 1.3 times. Personally, I think it is suitable for birdman to use APS-C as an auxiliary machine (such as the new 7D), and it needs to spend more money to buy a fully equipped host. Long-distance 1.6 times focal length conversion factor is the advantage of APS-C, and it is also the reason why buying two lenses is not as good as buying two bodies. I watched the recent 1D4 conference, and the imaging was excellent, especially suitable for shooting news sports. The proofs were mainly sports, highlighting the advantages.
4. I just touched the fuselage of 7D today. Honestly, it feels really bad. It's no different from the 50D, except that there are more videos and continuous shooting is faster. Of course, unless you're going for this cheap castrated version of 1D4, I personally think it's better to buy a hard disk DV to shoot videos. Moreover, the listing price of new products is unstable. I think I can consider it if it is 8000 yuan, but at present, if it is, I will choose K20D, which is more practical.
5, APS machine is perfect, and the parameter 7D is the strongest, followed by 50D Nikon D300, all of which are good choices. If I were you, I would buy a 450D. I don't despise APS-C, but I don't expect much.
6. 1. Compared with SLR, there is no reflector on the side shaft, which reduces the thickness of the camera, reduces the vibration of the machine, and can realize the complete synchronization of the flash by using the mirror shutter.
2. For the paraxial camera, because of the focusing baseline and no reflector, the general wide-angle lens can be made very close to the negative film, and its structure and imaging are better than that of SLR. So short and standard focal length are its strengths, and telephoto is almost virtual. The advantage of SLR lies in its wide focal length coverage and unparalleled advantages in telephoto and macro.
3. Different shooting attitudes. The side shaft belongs to its ugly shape. You can see the scene outside the picture through the viewfinder, and press it at any time to make you feel like a director. SLR is ostentatious, you can't see anything by pressing the shutter, but it gives you a sense of accomplishment as a photographer.
4, paraxial parallax, and SLR is what you see is what you get. The sideline is to think about the camera, and the SLR is to look at the camera.
This is a better encyclopedic explanation than what I said, but my understanding is that 35 lateral axes such as Leica, street sweeping, night view and imaging are impeccable.
7. The new product is not on the market yet.
8. Not yet. APS-C is hard to say. After all, the listing of 7D caused an uproar in the market.
9. There are several series of Sony lenses, ordinary Sony (Minolta) A lens, high-end Sony G series and high-end Zeiss series. Among them, Zeiss lens is the most expensive 100% German lens.
Answer to the supplementary question: I personally recommend Canon SX200. Attach the address link of the evaluation.
/pingce/xfl _ DC _ pcyyr/0903/ 15863 14 . html