The judicial determination of specific trademark infringement is as follows: 1. The Trademark Law stipulates the manifestations of trademark infringement. Infringement of trademark rights mainly includes the following acts: holding infringing goods for the purpose of sales; Publish advertisements for infringing goods for the purpose of sales; And the act of holding infringing marks or packaging infringing marks for the purpose of manufacturing or selling infringing goods. Second, whether the processing behavior constitutes infringement. When processing goods with registered trademarks of others, the contractor shall examine whether the ordering party enjoys the trademark right. If it is not handled with due care, the contractor and the ordering party will constitute * * * infringement and shall be jointly liable for damages. If the contractor does not know that it is an infringing commodity and can provide proof of the rights of the ordering party and its trademark, it shall not be liable for infringement damages, but shall stop manufacturing. 3. Does accepting gifts constitute infringement? Since accepting gifts is a form of sales, it is an infringement of trademark rights, and the recipient of gifts should bear the responsibility of stopping the infringement; If he knows or should know that the donated goods are goods infringing trademark rights, he shall also be liable for damages. Four. Does the sales behavior after the termination of the trademark license contract constitute infringement? The plaintiff once licensed the defendant to use its registered trademark and signed a trademark license contract. However, after the contract was terminated, the defendant still had some goods with the plaintiff's trademark unsold, and the defendant continued to sell these goods to realize his own commercial interests. If there is an agreement in the trademark license contract or the parties reach an agreement on this issue, it shall be handled in accordance with the agreement of the parties; If there is no agreement or the parties cannot reach an agreement, a reasonable sales period can be determined according to the specific circumstances. If the licensee sells the goods manufactured within the term of the license contract within this period, it will not be regarded as infringement; Overdue sales constitute infringement. V. Whether the use of a trade name that infringes the trademark right after examination and approval by the relevant competent department constitutes infringement of the trademark right. Although the trade name has been examined and approved by the relevant competent department, if the name acts as a trademark when used, it will cause confusion and misunderstanding, which will constitute infringement of the trademark right. The approval of the enterprise name by the relevant competent department only shows that the use of the name conforms to the management norms of the department, and cannot be used as a basis for not infringing on the trademark rights of others. The relevant competent authorities have no right or ability to determine whether the applied enterprise name infringes the trademark rights of others, and their examination and approval cannot rule out the possibility that the name infringes the trademark rights of others. Does the change of trademark by intransitive verbs constitute infringement? The obligee has two registered trademarks, which are used on different grades of goods. If another person buys the low-grade goods of the obligee, removes its trademark and sells it after replacing it with the trademark used by the obligee on the high-grade goods, the obligee brings a lawsuit for trademark infringement, and the behavior of the accused infringer shall be deemed as "changing its registered trademark without the consent of the trademark registrant and putting the goods with the changed trademark on the market".