Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark inquiry - A man in Hunan purchased shampoo online and received "Pan Piaofei Silk" shampoo. Is the merchant committing fraud?
A man in Hunan purchased shampoo online and received "Pan Piaofei Silk" shampoo. Is the merchant committing fraud?

A netizen in Changsha, Hunan Province said that he received a "Pan Piaofeisi" online shopping shampoo, and it was accompanied by a short video, which aroused heated discussion among netizens. The video shows a man holding a bottle of shampoo that looks very similar to a famous brand, but the outer packaging says "Pan Piaofei Silk". Netizens joked: "Is this also a joint shampoo produced by three companies?"

The person who shot the video said that he bought the shampoo for his mother-in-law, and he was surprised when he saw the name on the outer packaging. I think it's funny. Since my mother-in-law is not very good at using mobile phones, she bought two bottles after seeing the advertisement on the e-commerce platform. After receiving the goods, she realized that it was "Pan Piaofisi". He also said that he and his wife had used it once and felt that this shampoo contained very little foam and was not easy to use. And "My hair was a little itchy after washing, and I threw it away after using it once."

The company to which "Pan Piaofisi" belongs has been sued several times for the crime of counterfeiting trademarks. As far as I know, "Pan Piaofisi" The company to which the trademark belongs is Guangzhou Longqier Cosmetics Co., Ltd. The registered trademark was internationally classified as Class 3 daily chemical appliances on December 21, 2018, and the trademark status is "challenge procedure is in progress." The company was established in October 2009. Its legal representative is Wu Jiaxi and its registered capital is RMB 2 million.

In addition to applying for the "Pan Piaofisi" trademark logo, the brands applied for also include "Yufang Zilaiya", "Qingsiyang", "Bao Boquan", "Imanlan Adao" "Fu" etc., the international classification is all Category 3 daily chemical appliances.

It is important to note that this company has been sued several times for trademark counterfeiting and patent infringement. In addition, the company also failed several sampling inspections, and the conclusion of the sampling inspection was that "the problems found have been enforced administratively."

Selling fake and shoddy products is absolutely intolerable to consumers. What do you think of this matter? Welcome to leave your opinion.