Trademark registration rejection review means that when a trademark is applied for registration, after review by the Trademark Office, it is deemed that the trademark cannot be registered and therefore is rejected. If the trademark applicant is not satisfied with the reasons for rejection by the Trademark Office , apply to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for rejection review of the trademark within a certain period of time. In fact, this review is equivalent to giving the trademark applicant a chance to state the reasons why his trademark can be successfully registered. Most trademarks have successfully obtained their own trademarks through the review process.

So, under what circumstances do people generally apply for trademark registration rejection review, and how can we improve the success rate of trademark registration rejection review?

After a trademark is rejected, first of all, it is necessary to look at the reasons for the rejection by the Trademark Office or what the trademark cited for rejection is. This requires a comprehensive and professional analysis. If the reason for rejection involves an absolute prohibition on trademark registration or a reason that is obviously irreversible, then the rejection review will be meaningless. If there is room for elaboration, such as some previously registered trademarks or similar trademarks consisting of similar goods, then you need to write a professional and highly targeted review statement for the cited trademark, and submit some corresponding supporting materials. Apply to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board.

What affects the success of a trademark reexamination is mainly the "weight" and "quality" of the reasons stated in the reexamination application, which are generally the following factors:

1. Apply for a trademark It is an unregistered trademark previously used by the applicant. After long-term use, it has gained a certain degree of popularity and reputation, and has formed a one-to-one correspondence with the applicant. It is distinguishable as a trademark and will not cause confusion to the relevant public. .

2. The applied trademark is a brand-new trademark created by the applicant. It has the originality and distinctiveness of the trademark and will not cause cognitive confusion to the relevant public.

3. Comparing the applied trademark and the cited trademark, there should be clear distinctions in terms of constituent elements, drawing methods, overall structure, salient parts, calling parts, meanings, etc., so as to avoid confusion among the public. . Enhance your persuasiveness through detailed explanations and supporting materials.

4. Based on the principle of consistent examination standards, cite cases in which some trademarks contain similar components and similar groups approved for use, but were finally approved for registration, to illustrate that the trademark itself is distinctive and can be distinguished. If the source of goods or services is functional, then approval and registration should be granted.

Through well-founded and professional comparison and analysis, the originality and distinctiveness of the applied trademark will become apparent, and the success rate of trademark rejection review will be greatly improved. It is recommended that applicants log in. For rejection review, professional consultants will make rigorous judgments based on the applicant's specific situation, write applications and collect strong evidence, effectively improve the success rate of review, and help applicants under a high-quality and guaranteed service system. Complete trademark registration.