1. Being listed in the list of business anomalies for 3 years and failing to fulfill relevant obligations;
2. Submitting false materials or concealing important facts by other fraudulent means, obtaining the change or cancellation of company registration, and the company registration is cancelled;
3. Organizing or planning pyramid selling activities or providing convenient conditions for pyramid selling activities, and being subjected to administrative punishment for more than three times within two years;
4. The illegal act of direct selling has been subject to administrative punishment for more than three times within two years;
5. Being subject to administrative punishment for unfair competition for more than three times within two years;
6. The goods or services provided do not meet the requirements of protecting personal and property safety, causing personal injury and other illegal acts that seriously infringe on consumers' rights and interests, and being subject to administrative punishment for more than three times within two years;
7. Being subjected to administrative punishment for more than three times within two years because of publishing false advertisements or publishing false advertisements of commodities or services related to consumers' life and health, causing personal injury or other serious social adverse effects;
8. Having been punished for trademark infringement for more than two times within five years;
9. Decided to stop accepting trademark agency business;
10. Other serious violations of industrial and commercial administration laws and administrative regulations as stipulated by the State Administration for Industry and Commerce.
The influence of the company's being included in the "list of people who have been executed in bad faith" on the legal representative and the solutions.
According to Article 3 of Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Restricting High Consumption of Executed Persons revised by the Supreme People's Court 20 15, the executed person is a unit, and the executed person, his legal representative, principal responsible person, person directly responsible for debt performance and actual controller shall not engage in the following behaviors of high consumption and unnecessary consumption in life and work:
When taking the means of transportation, choose the cabin above the second class of plane, train soft berth and ship;
High consumption in hotels, hotels, nightclubs, golf courses and other places above the star level; Purchase real estate or build, expand or decorate high-grade houses; Rent high-end office buildings, hotels, apartments and other places to work; Purchase non-operating vehicles; Travel, vacation; Private schools with high fees for children; Pay high premiums to buy insurance wealth management products; Take all seats on G-prefix EMU trains, first-class seats on other EMU trains and other non-essential consumption behaviors.
What needs to be emphasized is that even if the company is not included in the list of "persons subject to breach of trust", as long as the company fails to fulfill the payment obligations specified in the effective legal documents within the time limit specified in the enforcement notice, the court can still (upon application or at its own discretion) take consumption restriction measures against its legal representative, principal responsible person, person directly responsible for debt performance and actual controller, and shall not implement the above-mentioned high-consumption and non-life and work-necessary consumption behaviors.
That is to say, as long as the company fails to fulfill the payment obligations determined by the effective legal documents, its legal representative may be taken by the court to restrict consumption.
In addition, according to the Memorandum of Cooperation on "Building Honesty and Punishing Dishonesty" issued by the Central Civilization Office, the Supreme People's Court, the Ministry of Public Security, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, the China Banking Regulatory Commission, the Civil Aviation Administration of China and China Railway Corporation on March 20th, 20 14, the person subject to breach of trust is a unit, and the object of credit punishment also includes his legal representative, the main person in charge and the person directly responsible for debt performance. In addition to restricting consumption, credit punishment measures also include restricting loans from financial institutions or handling credit cards.
It can be seen that corporate debt is not only the business of the company, but also involves the legal representative, which has an adverse impact on the personal work and life of the legal representative. In a society that pays more and more attention to credit, the lack of credit will make people unable to move. In this regard, the legal representative of the company should attach great importance to it.
Some people may ask, "I am not a shareholder of the company, but a legal representative in name only. Should I take responsibility? " In this regard, the relevant document specifications do not distinguish. The legal representative is the representative of the company, which is clearly stipulated by law, whether it is a shareholder of the company or not. It is very wrong to think that a "nominal legal person" will not bear the responsibility.
Since the responsibility of the legal representative is so clear, how can the legal representative not be punished by credit because of the company's debts, or be removed from the credit punishment list? It's simple, just pay back the money! As long as the company can pay off all debts, the court will remove the company and its legal representative from the disciplinary list, whether before or after being punished by credit.