Every car has its own special features. Kubota has the advantage of low failure rate and stable performance. I won’t talk about Yanmar. The price is about the same as Kubota, but the failure rate is much higher than 688. The price is also almost twice as expensive as domestic brands.

Among the domestically produced cars, the speed is faster than harvesting, and the fastest is Aihe, which was renamed from the former Aigelai. The 2.2-meter cutting pair is 20 centimeters wider than the Wode and Starlight. The cleaning effect is worse than that of Starlight, but it is definitely the best among axial flow machines.

Ward's truck is incomparable with Aihe in terms of harvesting speed and cleaning, but Ward's truck is cheaper and cost-effective.

The entire threshing mechanism of Starlight is different from other harvesters. It has two rollers, and the cleaning effect is better than Kubota 688. The body is light, the fuel consumption is low, the failure rate is low, and the control performance is also made in China. The best in the machine.

Anyway, in terms of current reputation, the best harvester belongs to Kubota 688, with low fuel consumption, low failure rate and fast harvesting speed. Xingguang is considered the leader among domestic manufacturers, with low failure rate, easy-to-sell accessories and fast speed.